Research Grants

This page is used to provide assessment scores for the grant. Please use the rubric below the grant details

to enter your assessment score

Systematic revision of the genus Indigofera L. in the Greater Cape Floristic Region

Project summary:

The genus Indigofera within the GCFR comprises of over 100 species, of which, approximately 30 are undescribed. The primary aim of this study is to revise the genus Indigofera within the GCFR, including the description of all new species, produce a comprehensive molecular phylogeny and answer some evolutionary questions.

Cost: $

2000

Brian du Preez

Highest degree:

M.Sc. Botany

Year obtained:

2019

Applicant Status:

Current student

South Africa

Flowering plants

University of Cape Town

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

du Preez et al., 2017. Plastid capture and resultant fitness costs of hybridization in the Hirta clade of southern African Oxalis (Online: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0254629917304210)

du Preez, B. & Stirton, C.H. Two new species of Aspalathus (Fabaceae, Faboideae) and notes on two rediscovered species from the Western Cape Province, South Africa (In preparation for submission to Bothalia: ABC Journal)

du Preez et al. The genus Polhillia (Genisteae: Fabaceae): A Monograph (Submitted for publication in SAJB)

du Preez, B. & Stirton, C.H. Aspalathus gibbodorsalis: A new tree-like species of Aspalathus (Fabaceae, Faboideae) from the Western Cape Province, South Africa (Submitted for publication in Phytotaxa)

Referee 1:

Prof. A.M. Muasya

Referee 2:

Prof. C.L. Moloney

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

Scientific merit

 

1.  Contribution to novel methods for research in systematics and taxonomy and/or
     Building taxonomic capacity in developing countries

2.  Contribution to the generation of novel systematic data

3.  Quality and significance of questions being addressed

4.  Adequacy of methods for testing hypotheses (data collection/analysis/use of different tools)

This proposal scores:

/60

IAPT community building

 

5.  Student's potential for professional success

6.  Perceived need; extent to which the project will benefit from IAPT funding

This proposal scores:

/20

Broader Impacts

​​

7.  The research will yield durable benefits (revisions, databases, websites)

8.  Potential of the proposed project to generate an impactful publication

9.  The proposed research involves outreach/mentoring and broad dissemination

This proposal scores:

/20

Donate to IAPT when you shop on Amazon

Unless otherwise specified, content on this website is licensed under Creative Commons CC-BY. Please see our Terms of Use for more information.