top of page

Research Grants

This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.

Collected species of the genus Camellia l. (Theaceae) in Lam Dong province, Vietnam

Project summary:

The project will organise three surveys to collect Camellia species in Lam Dong province, Vietnam. Determine the number of Camellia species and make 40 specimens to storage at Da Lat University.

First Name:

Quach Van Hoi

Highest degree:

Follow Ph.D.

Year obtained:

2018

Applicant Status:

Current student

Vietnam

Flowering plants

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Hoi, Q.V., Roman V.D., Cuong T.Q.C., Son L.V., Dung L.V., Kim S.Y. & Yang, S.X. 2020. Rediscovery of Camellia langbianensis (Theaceae) in Vietnam. Phytotaxa 480 (1): 085–090.

Hoi, Q.V., Dung L.V., Roman.V.D., Averyanov L.V., Thinh B.B., Lieu N.T. & Truong L.H. (2021). Camellia proensis (Theaceae, sect. Piquetia), a new species from Southern Vietnam. Phytotaxa 479 (1), 137–141.

Loc, P.K., Pranom, C., Hoi, Q.V. & Tuan, N.H. Mastixia langbianensis (Nyssaceae), a New Species from Vietnam. Tropical Natural History 20(3): 228–234.

H’Yon, N.B., Tham D.T., Vinh T.T., Hoi, Q.V., Cong V.K. & Duy N.V., 2018. In vitro propagation of the new orchid Dendrobium trankimianum T. Yukawa. Journal of Biotechnology 16(4): 649-657

Applicant Details

email:

Country:

Target organism/s:

Previous publications

Budget (USD):

2000

Tay Nguyen Institute for Scientific, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology

Affiliation:

Grant Assessment

Last Name:

Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?

Year of previous application:

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

c1. Scientific Merit

 

  • Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points

  • Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points

  • Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points

  • Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/35

C2. Community Building

 

  • Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points

  • Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points

  • Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points

This proposal scores:

/25

C3. Broader Impacts

  • The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points

  • The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits  – up to 10 points

  • The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange  – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/40

bottom of page