Research Grants

This page is used to provide assessment scores for the grant. Please use the rubric below the grant details

to enter your assessment score

Project summary:

The aim of the project is the differentiation of both the chasmogamous and cleistogamous flowers of Utricularia triloba and U. subulata with the main focus on genetic divergence. We plan to analyse genes from different genomes (nuclear DNA and cpDNA). The divergences found will be applied for phylogenetical analysis.

Cost: $

2000

Samanta Gabriela Medeiros Carvalho

Highest degree:

Masters

Year obtained:

Year

Applicant Status:

Current student

Brazil

Flowering plants

São Paulo State University (Unesp)

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Silva, R. S., Płachno, B. J., Carvalho, S. G. M., Miranda, V. F. O., 2020. Genlisea hawkingii (Lentibulariaceae), a new species from Serra da Canastra, Minas Gerais, Brazil. PLoS ONE, 15 (1), e0226337.

Płachno, B. J., Świątek, P., Adamec, L., Carvalho, S., Miranda, V. F. O., 2019. The Architecture of Utricularia multifida and Utricularia westonii (subg. Polypompholyx). Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 336. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00336

Souza, I. R. P., Barros, B. A., Xavier, A. S., Carvalho, S. G. M., Sabato, E. O.; Goncalves, I. A. M., Noda, R. W., Rodrigues, J. A. S., 2017. Johnsongrass mosaic virus infecting sorghum in Brazil. International Journal of Current Research, 9, 63415-63422

Souza, I. R. P., Macêdo, G. A. R., Barbosa, M. H. P., Barros, B. A., Carvalho, S. G. M., Xavier, A. S., Goncalves, I. A. M., 2017. Reaction of sugarcane genotypes to strains of the Sugarcane Mosaic Vírus. International Journal of Current Research, 9, 59112-59119.

Referee 1:

Vitor Fernandes Oliveira de Miranda

Referee 2:

Bartosz Jean Płachno

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

Scientific merit

 

1.  Contribution to novel methods for research in systematics and taxonomy and/or
     Building taxonomic capacity in developing countries

2.  Contribution to the generation of novel systematic data

3.  Quality and significance of questions being addressed

4.  Adequacy of methods for testing hypotheses (data collection/analysis/use of different tools)

This proposal scores:

/60

IAPT community building

 

5.  Student's potential for professional success

6.  Perceived need; extent to which the project will benefit from IAPT funding

This proposal scores:

/20

Broader Impacts

​​

7.  The research will yield durable benefits (revisions, databases, websites)

8.  Potential of the proposed project to generate an impactful publication

9.  The proposed research involves outreach/mentoring and broad dissemination

This proposal scores:

/20

Donate to IAPT when you shop on Amazon

Unless otherwise specified, content on this website is licensed under Creative Commons CC-BY. Please see our Terms of Use for more information.