top of page

Research Grants

This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.

Formation and Persistence of a Co-Occurring Mixed Cytotype Autopolyploid System

Project summary:

The impact of multiple origins on the genetics and ecology of a naturally occurring multi-cytotype autopolyploid system has largely been overlooked. Multiple formations of both the triploid and tetraploid cytotypes of Galax urceolata (Diapensiaceae) make this the ideal system to investigate relatedness among cytotypes and cytotype-specific soil chemistry/microbial associations.

First Name:

Michelle Gaynor

Highest degree:

BS

Year obtained:

2018

Applicant Status:

Current student

USA

Flowering plants

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Gaynor ML, Marchant DB, Soltis DE, and Soltis PS. 2018. Climatic niche comparison among ploidal levels in the classic autopolyploid system, Galax urceolata (Diapensiaceae). American Journal of Botany, 105(10): 1–12. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1161.

Gaynor ML, Ng J, and Laport RG. 2018. Phylogenetic structure of plant communities: Are polyploids distantly related to co-occurring diploids? Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 6(52): 1-14. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2018.00052.

Gaynor ML, Walters LJ, and Hoffman EA. 2019. Assessing genetic diversity within natural populations of smooth cordgrass to ensure effective restoration efforts. Restoration Ecology, 27(6): 1452 – 1462. doi: 10.1111/rec.1301

An H, Qi X, Gaynor ML, Hao Y, Grebken SC, Mabry ME, Conant GC, Barker M, Fu T, Yi B, and Pires JC. 2019. Transcriptome and organellar sequencing highlights the complex origin and diversification of allotetraploid Brassica napus. Nature Communication, 10: 2878. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10757-1

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

c1. Scientific Merit

 

  • Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points

  • Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points

  • Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points

  • Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/35

C2. Community Building

 

  • Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points

  • Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points

  • Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points

This proposal scores:

/25

C3. Broader Impacts

  • The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points

  • The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits  – up to 10 points

  • The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange  – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/40

Applicant Details

email:

Country:

Target organism/s:

Previous publications

Budget (USD):

2000

University of Florida

Affiliation:

Grant Assessment

Last Name:

Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?

Year of previous application:

bottom of page