Research Grants

This page is used to provide assessment scores for the grant. Please use the rubric below the grant details

to enter your assessment score

Systematics studies of Psidium striatulum complex (Myrteae, Myrtaceae)

Project summary:

The present project seeks to investigate the phylogenetic relationships of the “Psidium striatulum complex” (Myrteae, Myrtaceae) and taxonomic revision of this group.

Cost: $

1850

Amélia Carlos Tuler

Highest degree:

PhD of Botany

Year obtained:

2018

Applicant Status:

Early-career researcher (PhD obtained within last three years)

Brazil

Flowering plants

Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES) – Vitória, ES, Brazil

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

TULER, A.C; CARRIJO, T.T; PEIXOTO, A.L; GARBIN, M.L; FERREIRA, M.F.S; CARVALHO, C.R; SPADETO, M.S; CLARINDO, W.R. Diversification and geographical distribution of Psidium (Myrtaceae) species with distinct ploidy levels. TREES (BERLIN. INTERNET), v. 33, p. 1101-1110, 2019.

TULER, A.C; CARRIJO, T.T; PEIXOTO, A.L. New synonyms and typifications in Psidium species described by João Rodrigues Mattos (Myrtaceae): the importance of maintaining scientific collections. PHYTOTAXA, v. 400, p. 298-300, 2019.

TULER, A.C; PROENÇA, C. E. B; CARRIJO.T.T; PEIXOTO, A.L. Typification and nomenclatural notes on Psidium cattleyanum (Myrtaceae). TAXON, p. 1194-1198, 2018.

TULER, A.C; COSTA, C.M; CARRIJO, T.T; PEIXOTO, A.L. Psidium pulcherrimum (Myrtaceae, Myrteae), a new species from Bahia, Brazil. BRITTONIA, v. 72, p. 1, 2019.

Referee 1:

Ariane Luna Peixoto

Referee 2:

Tatiana Tavares Carrijo

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

Scientific merit

 

1.  Contribution to novel methods for research in systematics and taxonomy and/or
     Building taxonomic capacity in developing countries

2.  Contribution to the generation of novel systematic data

3.  Quality and significance of questions being addressed

4.  Adequacy of methods for testing hypotheses (data collection/analysis/use of different tools)

This proposal scores:

/60

IAPT community building

 

5.  Student's potential for professional success

6.  Perceived need; extent to which the project will benefit from IAPT funding

This proposal scores:

/20

Broader Impacts

​​

7.  The research will yield durable benefits (revisions, databases, websites)

8.  Potential of the proposed project to generate an impactful publication

9.  The proposed research involves outreach/mentoring and broad dissemination

This proposal scores:

/20

Donate to IAPT when you shop on Amazon

Unless otherwise specified, content on this website is licensed under Creative Commons CC-BY. Please see our Terms of Use for more information.