Research Grants

This page is used to provide assessment scores for the grant. Please use the rubric below the grant details

to enter your assessment score

Integrative taxonomy and systematics of a species complex in Chromolaena (Asteraceae, Eupatorieae, Praxelinae)

Project summary:

The aim os this study is to investigate the identity, evolution and relationship of the taxa included in the "Chromolaena congesta complex" through morphometric, cytogenetic and phylogenetic analyses. This group of species is distributed through southeastern South America and is common in both dry and highland grasslands, althrough some species are rarer than others. A better understanding of the taxonomy and systematics of these species should help us in further studies with other taxonomically challenging groups in Chromolaena, one of the biggest and most widespread genera in Eupatorieae

Cost: $

2000

Anderson Luiz Christ

Highest degree:

Master's degree

Year obtained:

2018

Applicant Status:

Current student

Brazil

Flowering plants

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Christ, A.L.; Ritter, M.R. 2019. A taxonomic study of Praxelinae (Asteraceae-Eupatorieae) in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Phytotaxa, 393(2);141-197.

Christ, A.L.; Ritter, M.R. 2018. Typifications in Chromolaena and Praxelis (Asteraceae: Eupatorieae). Phytotaxa, 362:112-114.

BFG – The Brazil Flora Group; Christ, A.L. 2018. Brazilian Flora 2020: Innovation and collaboration to meet Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC). Rodriguésia, 69:1513-1527.

Referee 1:

Mara Rejane Ritter

Referee 2:

Jimi Naoki Nakajim

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

Scientific merit

 

1.  Contribution to novel methods for research in systematics and taxonomy and/or
     Building taxonomic capacity in developing countries

2.  Contribution to the generation of novel systematic data

3.  Quality and significance of questions being addressed

4.  Adequacy of methods for testing hypotheses (data collection/analysis/use of different tools)

This proposal scores:

/60

IAPT community building

 

5.  Student's potential for professional success

6.  Perceived need; extent to which the project will benefit from IAPT funding

This proposal scores:

/20

Broader Impacts

​​

7.  The research will yield durable benefits (revisions, databases, websites)

8.  Potential of the proposed project to generate an impactful publication

9.  The proposed research involves outreach/mentoring and broad dissemination

This proposal scores:

/20

Donate to IAPT when you shop on Amazon

Unless otherwise specified, content on this website is licensed under Creative Commons CC-BY. Please see our Terms of Use for more information.