top of page

Research Grants

This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.

Dioecy and resiniferous flowers in Clusieae tribe (Clusiaceae): phylogeny and evolutionary patterns

Project summary:

Two of the biggest genera with dioecious plants and resiniferous flowers are Chrysochlamys and Clusia (Clusiaceae: Clusieae). Unfortunately, their molecular information is scarce. My research addresses systematics, diversity, and evolution of Clusieae tribe using an integrative approach and including genomic information as an alternative line of evidence

First Name:

Angy Vanesa Caro Sánchez

angy.caro@udea.edu.co

Highest degree:

Bachelor of Science (Biologist)

Year obtained:

2021

Applicant Status:

Current student

Colombia

Flowering plants

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Caro-Sanchez, A. V., Idarraga-Piedrahíta, A ., & Alzate-Guarín, F. (2022). Novelties in Chrysochlamys
membranacea (Clusiaceae: Clusieae), an Update on the Nomenclatural and Morphological Knowledge
of this Species Described from Biogeographic Choco, Colombia. Asian Plant Research Journal, 10(2),
11-20. DOI:10.11646/phytotaxa.663.4.4

Marinho, L. C., & Caro-Sanchez, A. V. (2024). Clusia aequatoriensis, a new combination based on
Tovomita aequatoriensis (Clusiaceae). Harvard Papers in Botany, 29(1), 119-120.
DOI:10.3100/hpib.v29iss1.2024.n13

Caro-Sanchez, A. V., Marinho, L. C., Idarraga-Piedrahí ta, A., & Alzate-Guarín, F. (2024). Miscellaneous
nomenclatural notes on Andean Chrysochlamys (Clusiaceae: Clusieae). Phytotaxa, 663(4), 221-230.
DOI:10.11646/phytotaxa.663.4.4

​

Applicant Details

email:

Country:

Target organism/s:

Previous publications

Budget (USD):

1994

Universidad de Antioquia

Affiliation:

Grant Assessment

Last Name:

​

​

Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?

​

Year of previous application:

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

c1. Scientific Merit

 

  • Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points

  • Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points

  • Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points

  • Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/35

C2. Community Building

 

  • Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points

  • Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points

  • Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points

This proposal scores:

/25

C3. Broader Impacts

​

  • The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points

  • The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits  – up to 10 points

  • The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange  – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/40

bottom of page