Research Grants

This page is used to provide assessment scores for the grant. Please use the rubric below the grant details

to enter your assessment score

Study of the challenging Margyricarpus pinnatus (Rosaceae: Sanguisorbeae) complex

Project summary:

Margyricarpus pinnatus is a species complex distributed throgouth South America. During field trips in southern Brazil, we found several different morphologies on these plants, but the characteristics in literature are unuseful to distinguish them. The aim is to determine the type species, and them split the other as new species.

Cost: $

1918

Luís Adriano Funez

Highest degree:

M.Sc.

Year obtained:

2016

Applicant Status:

Current student

Brazil

Flowering plants

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Funez, L.A., Ribeiro-Nardes, W., Kossmann, T., Peroni, N. & Dreschsler-Santos, E.R. (2019) Prosopanche demogorgoni: A new species of Prosopanche (Aristolochiaceae: Hydnoroideae) from southern Brazil. Phytotaxa 422 (1): 93–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.422.1.6

Funez, L.A. & Hassemer, G. (2018) Novelties in the genus Persicaria (Polygonaceae) in Brazil: a new species, a new combination, and a diagnostic key to all species. Nordic Journal of Botany 36 (1-2): e01631 https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.01631

Funez, L.A. & Hassemer, G. (2017) Phyllanthus eremitus (Phyllanthaceae), a narrowly endemic new species from Santa Catarina, southern Brazil, and lectotypification and range extension of P. hyssopifolioides. Phytotaxa 319 (2): 149–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.319.2.3

Funez, L.A., Hassemer, G. & Trevisan, R. (2016) Rediscovery, typification, and conservation assessment of Saranthe ustulata (Marantaceae). Phytotaxa 255 (1): 91–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.255.1.9

Referee 1:

André Luis de Gasper

Referee 2:

Gustavo Hassemer

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

Scientific merit

 

1.  Contribution to novel methods for research in systematics and taxonomy and/or
     Building taxonomic capacity in developing countries

2.  Contribution to the generation of novel systematic data

3.  Quality and significance of questions being addressed

4.  Adequacy of methods for testing hypotheses (data collection/analysis/use of different tools)

This proposal scores:

/60

IAPT community building

 

5.  Student's potential for professional success

6.  Perceived need; extent to which the project will benefit from IAPT funding

This proposal scores:

/20

Broader Impacts

​​

7.  The research will yield durable benefits (revisions, databases, websites)

8.  Potential of the proposed project to generate an impactful publication

9.  The proposed research involves outreach/mentoring and broad dissemination

This proposal scores:

/20

Donate to IAPT when you shop on Amazon

Unless otherwise specified, content on this website is licensed under Creative Commons CC-BY. Please see our Terms of Use for more information.