Research Grants
This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.
Straightening things out: building a monograph and a phylogeny for fire-vines (Doliocarpus Rol., Dilleniaceae)
Project summary:
Doliocarpus (Dilleniaceae) is a genus restricted to the Neotropics comprising ca 55 species, most of which have been described since the last revision more than 50 years ago. The IAPT-Grant would help applicant to visit herbaria in America where large collections are deposited and perform analyzes for his PhD monograph.
First Name:
João Victor Longhi Monzoli
Highest degree:
Master
Year obtained:
2020
Applicant Status:
Current student
Brazil
Flowering plants
Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):
Monzoli, J. V. L., Araújo, M. D. D. F., Fraga, C. N. D. & Silveira, D. S.
2022. Two New Species of Doliocarpus (Dilleniaceae) from Eastern Brazil, with an
Emended Key for Species of Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Sys. Bot., 47(4), 952-961
Applicant Details
email:
Country:
Target organism/s:
Previous publications
Budget (USD):
2000
São Paulo State University, Institute of Biosciences, Letters and Exact Sciences (UNESP/IBILCE)
Affiliation:
Grant Assessment
Last Name:
Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?
Year of previous application:
Scoring Rubric
Your name:
c1. Scientific Merit
-
Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points
-
Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points
-
Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points
-
Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points
This proposal scores:
/35
C2. Community Building
-
Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points
-
Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points
-
Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points
This proposal scores:
/25
C3. Broader Impacts
-
The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points
-
The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits – up to 10 points
-
The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange – up to 10 points
This proposal scores:
/40