top of page

Research Grants

This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.

Systematics and evolution of Rhynchospora Vahl. sect. Pauciflorae
Kük. (Cyperaceae Juss.).

Project summary:

Rhynchospora sect. Pauciflorae is poorly circumscribed, has not been revised in over 70
years, and is the focus of my doctoral dissertation. My objective is to consult the diverse
collection and types of Pauciflorae and related species in the herbarium (NY) of the New
York Botanical Garden.

First Name:

Karina de Nazaré Lima Alves

Highest degree:

Masters

Year obtained:

2020

Applicant Status:

Current student

Brazil

Flowering plants

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Brazil Flora Group; Alves, K.N.L. Brazilian Flora 2020: Leveraging the power of a collaborative scientific network. Taxon, pp. 1-21, 2021.

Alves, K.N.L.; Schneider, L.; Dias, K.; Gil, A. Cyperaceae Juss. in Serra dos
Martírios-Andorinhas, Pará, Brazil. Rodriguésia, in press.

Silva, C.L.B.; Nunes, C.S.; Schneider, L.J.C.; Maciel-Silva, J.F.; Alves, K.N.L.;
Conde, M.L.G.; Fernandes-Junior, A.J.F.; Gil, A.S.B. “Cyperaceae Juss. nos
Campos de Natureza de Cametá, Pará, Amazônia, Brasil” ( in portuguese).
Iheringia, Série Botânica, v. 76, 2021.

Alves, K.N.L.; Mesquita, U.O.; Leão, V.M.; Gois, M.A.F.; Vieira, E.F.M.;
Neves, R.H.P.; Souza, J.P.S.; Lucas, F.C.A; Costa, J.C.M. Depository centers
for medicinal plants: herbaria as tool for biodiversity management. Revista
Fitos Eletrônica, v. 11, pp. 26-37, 2017.

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

c1. Scientific Merit

 

  • Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points

  • Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points

  • Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points

  • Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/35

C2. Community Building

 

  • Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points

  • Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points

  • Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points

This proposal scores:

/25

C3. Broader Impacts

  • The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points

  • The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits  – up to 10 points

  • The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange  – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/40

Applicant Details

email:

Country:

Target organism/s:

Previous publications

Budget (USD):

2000

Paraense Emílio Goeldi Museum and Amazon Federal Rural University

Affiliation:

Grant Assessment

Last Name:

Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?

Year of previous application:

bottom of page