Research Grants

This page is used to provide assessment scores for the grant. Please use the rubric below the grant details

to enter your assessment score

Systematics of Philippine Cyrtandra J.R.Forst. & G.Forst. (Gesneriaceae)

Project summary:

The project entitled Systematics of Philippine Cyrtandra J.R.Forst. & G.Forst. (Gesneriaceae) is the PhD project of the author. The project aims to: (1) conduct a taxonomic revision of Philippine Cyrtandra; (2) utilize molecular phylogenetic analyses to resolve evolutionary species relationships and to examine their rich assembly; and, (3) perform analyses of biogeography and evolutionary dynamics. The grant money is planned to be used for herbarium visits and fieldwork in the Philippines particularly in the island of Mindanao where sampling has been scarce. Fieldwork will be in coordination C

Cost: $

2000

Jay Edneil Olivar

Highest degree:

Master of Science

Year obtained:

2017

Applicant Status:

Current student

Philippines

Flowering plants

University of Leipzig

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Olivar, J. E. C., Atkins, H., Hauenschild, F. & Muellner-Riehl, A. (in press). Cyrtandra argentii, a new species of Cyrtandra (Gesneriaceae) from the Philippines, and a review of the C. villosissima group. European Journal of Taxonomy.

Olivar, J. E. C. & Muellner-Riehl, A. (2019) Replacement names for Cyrtandra humilis Elmer and Cyrtandra umbellata Kraenzl., two endemic Philippine species (Gesneriaceae). Phytotaxa 418 (1): 117–118.

Referee 1:

Alexandra Muellner-Riehl

Referee 2:

Frank Hauenschild

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

Scientific merit

 

1.  Contribution to novel methods for research in systematics and taxonomy and/or
     Building taxonomic capacity in developing countries

2.  Contribution to the generation of novel systematic data

3.  Quality and significance of questions being addressed

4.  Adequacy of methods for testing hypotheses (data collection/analysis/use of different tools)

This proposal scores:

/60

IAPT community building

 

5.  Student's potential for professional success

6.  Perceived need; extent to which the project will benefit from IAPT funding

This proposal scores:

/20

Broader Impacts

​​

7.  The research will yield durable benefits (revisions, databases, websites)

8.  Potential of the proposed project to generate an impactful publication

9.  The proposed research involves outreach/mentoring and broad dissemination

This proposal scores:

/20

Donate to IAPT when you shop on Amazon

Unless otherwise specified, content on this website is licensed under Creative Commons CC-BY. Please see our Terms of Use for more information.