Research Grants

This page is used to provide assessment scores for the grant. Please use the rubric below the grant details

to enter your assessment score

The Alpinia sect. Myriocrater (Zingiberaceae) of the Philippines

Project summary:

The Alpinia sect. Myriocrater of the Philippines is understudied. Initial examination of specimens from several localities identified as A. musifolia or A. vulcanica revealed that it did not match the morphology of the two latter species. This project aims to provide a taxonomic revision of the section in the Philippines.

Cost: $

1971

Rudolph Valentino A. Docot

Highest degree:

Masters Degree

Year obtained:

2016

Applicant Status:

Early-career researcher (PhD obtained within last three years)

Philippines

Flowering plants

Far Eastern University

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Docot, R.V.A., Banag, C.I. & Poulsen, A.D. (2019). Reinstatement and revision of the genus Adelmeria Ridl. (Zingiberaceae) endemic to the Philippines. Taxon 68(3): 499−521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12071

Docot, R.V.A., Banag C.I., Tandang, D.N., Funakoshi, H. & Poulsen, A.D. (2019 in press). Recircumscription and revision of Vanoverberghia (Zingiberaceae). Blumea 64(2): 140–157. https://doi.org/10.3767/blumea.2019.64.02.05

Poulsen, A.D. & Docot, R.V.A. (2018). How many Etlingera species are there in the Philippines? Edinburgh Journal of Botany 75(3): 1‒12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960428618000240

Docot, R.V.A., Gutierrez, K.D., Mamalias, R.E.E., Espino, N.B.R., Java, A.A.B., Dineros, C.D. & Mijares, E.M.L. (2019). Two new Zingiber species (Zingiberaceae) from Sorsogon, Philippines. Gardens Bulletin Singapore 71(2): 459–475. https://doi: 10.26492/gbs71(2).2019-14

Referee 1:

Axel Dalberg Poulsen, Ph.D.

Referee 2:

Sandra L. Yap, Ph.D.

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

Scientific merit

 

1.  Contribution to novel methods for research in systematics and taxonomy and/or
     Building taxonomic capacity in developing countries

2.  Contribution to the generation of novel systematic data

3.  Quality and significance of questions being addressed

4.  Adequacy of methods for testing hypotheses (data collection/analysis/use of different tools)

This proposal scores:

/60

IAPT community building

 

5.  Student's potential for professional success

6.  Perceived need; extent to which the project will benefit from IAPT funding

This proposal scores:

/20

Broader Impacts

​​

7.  The research will yield durable benefits (revisions, databases, websites)

8.  Potential of the proposed project to generate an impactful publication

9.  The proposed research involves outreach/mentoring and broad dissemination

This proposal scores:

/20

Donate to IAPT when you shop on Amazon

Unless otherwise specified, content on this website is licensed under Creative Commons CC-BY. Please see our Terms of Use for more information.