top of page

Research Grants

This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.

-Disentangling the Gordian knot of the Verbenaceae - Lantana L. and Lippia L. in the Andes of South America

Project summary:

Field explorations are planned to collect Lippia and Lantana plants from unknown or poorly collected areas in Ecuador and Peru. This will help to decide upon the conservation status of species concerned. Subsequently, by means of molecular phylogenetic studies, relationship and boundaries between species are aimed to be resolved.

First Name:

Fabiana Mirra

Highest degree:

Agronomic engineer

Year obtained:

2020

Applicant Status:

Current student

Argentina

Flowering plants

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

F. Mirra, N. O'Leary, & P. Moroni. Typification of names linked to Phacelia (Hydrophyllaceae) for Flora Argentina. Darwiniana, nueva serie 9(1): 209-216.

P. Moroni, F. Mirra, P. Luebert & N. O’Leary. Nomenclatural revision of Heliotropiaceae names linked to Southern Cone taxa. Novon: A Journal for Botanical Nomenclature 29(1): 188-193.

N. O’Leary, L. Frost, F. Mirra & P. Moroni. Insights into the taxonomy of Citharexylum L. (Verbenaceae): A revision of the South American taxa. Annals Missouri Bot. Gard. 106: 167-233

V. Ortiz, P. Moroni, F. Mirra, R. Villanueva Espinoza, & N. O’Leary. Taxonomic revision of Euphrasia L. (Orobanchaceae) in South America. Annals Missouri Bot. Gard. 106: 392-423.

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

c1. Scientific Merit

 

  • Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points

  • Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points

  • Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points

  • Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/35

C2. Community Building

 

  • Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points

  • Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points

  • Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points

This proposal scores:

/25

C3. Broader Impacts

  • The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points

  • The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits  – up to 10 points

  • The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange  – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/40

Applicant Details

email:

Country:

Target organism/s:

Previous publications

Budget (USD):

2000

Instituto de Botanica Darwinion, CONICET-

Affiliation:

Grant Assessment

Last Name:

Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?

Year of previous application:

bottom of page