Research Grants

This page is used to provide assessment scores for the grant. Please use the rubric below the grant details

to enter your assessment score

Project summary:

This project seeks to integrate well-preserved fossil flowers into phylogenetic frameworks combined with extant taxa, with the purpose of investigating the time of origin and diversification of all angiosperm families, as well as broad-patterns of floral evolution informed by the combination of fossils and extant taxa.

Cost: $

2000

Andrea López Martínez

Highest degree:

Master

Year obtained:

Year

Applicant Status:

Current student

México

Flowering plants, Fossils

Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Sauquet, H., von Balthazar, M., Magallón, S., Doyle, J., Endress, P., & Bailes, E. et al. 2017. The ancestral flower of angiosperms and its early diversification. Nature Communications, 8(1).

Friis, E., Marone, F., Pedersen, K., Crane, P., & Stampanoni, M. 2014. Three- dimensional visualization of fossil flowers, fruits, seeds, and other plant remains using synchrotron radiation X-ray tomographic microscopy (SRXTM): new insights into Cretaceous plant diversity. Journal of Paleontology, 88(4), 684-701.

Heath, T., Huelsenbeck, J., & Stadler, T. 2014. The fossilized birth-death process for coherent calibration of divergence-time estimates. Proceedings of The National Academy Of Sciences, 111(29), E2957-E2966. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319091111

Friis Else Marie, Pedersen Kaj Raunsgaard and Crane Peter R. 2010. Diversity in obscurity: fossil flowers and the early history of angiosperms. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365: 369-382

Referee 1:

Susana Magallón

Referee 2:

Hervé Sauquet

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

Scientific merit

 

1.  Contribution to novel methods for research in systematics and taxonomy and/or
     Building taxonomic capacity in developing countries

2.  Contribution to the generation of novel systematic data

3.  Quality and significance of questions being addressed

4.  Adequacy of methods for testing hypotheses (data collection/analysis/use of different tools)

This proposal scores:

/60

IAPT community building

 

5.  Student's potential for professional success

6.  Perceived need; extent to which the project will benefit from IAPT funding

This proposal scores:

/20

Broader Impacts

​​

7.  The research will yield durable benefits (revisions, databases, websites)

8.  Potential of the proposed project to generate an impactful publication

9.  The proposed research involves outreach/mentoring and broad dissemination

This proposal scores:

/20

Donate to IAPT when you shop on Amazon

Unless otherwise specified, content on this website is licensed under Creative Commons CC-BY. Please see our Terms of Use for more information.