top of page

Research Grants

This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.

A phylogeny and new classification for Thymelaeoideae (Thymelaeaceae): A final resolution to the problem of polyphyly in Gnidia L.

Project summary:

The polyphyletic nature of the genus Gnidia posed a challenge to the taxonomists for a long time. But an inadequate sampling of Gnidia in the Thymelaeaceae phylogeny hindered a final resolution. The proposed research aims to resolve Gnidia's classification issues through comprehensive sampling and phylogenetic analysis integrating morphological data

First Name:

Oluwayemisi Dorcas Olaniyan

Highest degree:

PhD

Year obtained:

2022

Applicant Status:

Early-career researcher (PhD obtained within last three years)

South Africa

Flowering plants

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Olaniyan, O. D., Boatwright, J. S., Magee, A. R., Manning, J. C., & Bank, M. (2024). Molecular support for transferring the tropical African species of Gnidia to Lasiosiphon (Thymelaeaceae: Thymelaeoideae) and a worldwide synopsis of the species. Journal of plant systematics and evolution (under review). [Preprint]. Research square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3910184/v1

Olaniyan, O. D., Boatwright, J. S., Magee, A. R., Manning, J. C., & van der Bank, M. (2023). A taxonomic revision of the Gnidia linearifolia (Wikstr.) B.Peterson group (Thymelaeaceae: Thymeleaoideae): an endemic group of the Cape Floristic Region. South African Journal of Botany, 163, 367–375

Olaniyan, O.D. (2021). Systematics of Thymelaeoideae (Thymelaeaceae) in southern Africa (Publication No. 29356354) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Johannesburg]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Olaniyan, O. D., van der Bank, M., Boatwright, J. S., Magee, A. R., & Manning, J. C. (2020). A taxonomic revision of Englerodaphne Gilg (Thymelaeaceae: Thymelaeoideae). South African Journal of Botany, 130, 348–355

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

c1. Scientific Merit

 

  • Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points

  • Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points

  • Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points

  • Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/35

C2. Community Building

 

  • Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points

  • Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points

  • Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points

This proposal scores:

/25

C3. Broader Impacts

  • The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points

  • The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits  – up to 10 points

  • The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange  – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/40

Applicant Details

email:

Country:

Target organism/s:

Previous publications

Budget (USD):

2000

University of Johannesburg, South Africa

Affiliation:

Grant Assessment

Last Name:

Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?

Year of previous application:

bottom of page