Research Grants

This page is used to provide assessment scores for the grant. Please use the rubric below the grant details

to enter your assessment score

Project summary:

Present a taxonomic revision of Aguiaria, Catostemma and Scleronema, supported by a well-sampled molecular phylogeny. Test the monophyly and the relationship between these three genera, based on molecular data and supported by the evolution of selected morphological characters. Reevaluate species’ boundaries, recognizing diagnostic features and the species’ geographical distribution.

Cost: $

2000

Carlos Daniel Miranda Ferreira

Highest degree:

MSc. Botany, PhD in progress (end date: February 2023)

Year obtained:

Year

Applicant Status:

Current student

Brazil

Flowering plants

Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Ferreira, C.D.M.; De Toni, K.L. & Bovini, M.G. (2018). Miscellaneous Additions to Quararibea (Malvaceae) from the Atlantic Forest of Southeast Brazil. Systematic Botany 43(4): 1011–1019.

Ferreira, C.D.M. Catostemma in Flora do Brasil 2020 em construção. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. <http://reflora.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/floradobrasil/FB78003>. Accessed: 09 Jan. 2020

Ferreira, C.D.M. Scleronema in Flora do Brasil 2020 em construção. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. <http://reflora.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/floradobrasil/FB84925>. Accessed: 09 Jan. 2020

Ferreira, C.D.M. Plantas da restinga de Jaconé (Saquarema/RJ). 1. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Autografia, 2017. v. 1. 212p.

Referee 1:

José Fernando A. Baumgratz

Referee 2:

William S. Alverson

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

Scientific merit

 

1.  Contribution to novel methods for research in systematics and taxonomy and/or
     Building taxonomic capacity in developing countries

2.  Contribution to the generation of novel systematic data

3.  Quality and significance of questions being addressed

4.  Adequacy of methods for testing hypotheses (data collection/analysis/use of different tools)

This proposal scores:

/60

IAPT community building

 

5.  Student's potential for professional success

6.  Perceived need; extent to which the project will benefit from IAPT funding

This proposal scores:

/20

Broader Impacts

​​

7.  The research will yield durable benefits (revisions, databases, websites)

8.  Potential of the proposed project to generate an impactful publication

9.  The proposed research involves outreach/mentoring and broad dissemination

This proposal scores:

/20

Donate to IAPT when you shop on Amazon

Unless otherwise specified, content on this website is licensed under Creative Commons CC-BY. Please see our Terms of Use for more information.