Research Grants

This page is used to provide assessment scores for the grant. Please use the rubric below the grant details

to enter your assessment score

Project summary:

This project is a systematic study of Inonotus s.l. taxa from Brazil, mainly from the Atlantic Forest, aiming to solve taxonomic complexes, improve the morphological delimitation of some taxa and find distribution and hosts patterns in the group. It will also provide new sequences, phylogenetic reconstructions and updated descriptions.

Cost: $

2000

Felipe Bittencourt

Highest degree:

Master of Science, PhD student

Year obtained:

Year

Applicant Status:

Current student

Brazil

Fungi

Federal University of Santa Catarina

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Bittencourt, F., Stürmer, S.L., Reck, M.A., Drechsler-Santos, E.R. (2018) Phylloporia minuta sp. nov. (Basidiomycota, Hymenochaetales): a remarkable species discovered in a small protected urban area of Atlantic Forest. Phytotaxa 348(3): 199-210. [http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.348.3.3]

Bittencourt, F., Gasper, A.L. (2016) First record of Pogoniopsis Rchb. (Orchidaceae: Triphorinae) in Santa Catarina state, southern Brazil. Check List 12(6): 1-5. [http://dx.doi.org/10.15560/12.6.1990]

Gasper, A.L., Vibrans, A.C., Funez, L.A., Rigon-Jr., M.J., Bittencourt, F., Vieira, C. (2014) Dr. Roberto Miguel Klein Herbarium (FURB), Blumenau, Southern Brazil. Phytokeys 42: 21-23. [https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.42.6865]

Referee 1:

Elisandro Ricardo Drechsler dos Santos

Referee 2:

André Luís de Gasper

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

Scientific merit

 

1.  Contribution to novel methods for research in systematics and taxonomy and/or
     Building taxonomic capacity in developing countries

2.  Contribution to the generation of novel systematic data

3.  Quality and significance of questions being addressed

4.  Adequacy of methods for testing hypotheses (data collection/analysis/use of different tools)

This proposal scores:

/60

IAPT community building

 

5.  Student's potential for professional success

6.  Perceived need; extent to which the project will benefit from IAPT funding

This proposal scores:

/20

Broader Impacts

​​

7.  The research will yield durable benefits (revisions, databases, websites)

8.  Potential of the proposed project to generate an impactful publication

9.  The proposed research involves outreach/mentoring and broad dissemination

This proposal scores:

/20

Donate to IAPT when you shop on Amazon

Unless otherwise specified, content on this website is licensed under Creative Commons CC-BY. Please see our Terms of Use for more information.