Research Grants

This page is used to provide assessment scores for the grant. Please use the rubric below the grant details

to enter your assessment score

Phylogeny and taxonomic revision of the genus Comolia DC. (Melastomataceae, Marcetieae)

Project summary:

The Comolia genus has 11 species distributed across the Neotropic savannahs and sandbanks. From molecular analysis with materials collected in the field and from herbaria, combined with morphometric studies, we intend to understand the systematic relations of Comolia, expanding the phylogeny of the genus and clarifying a complex of species.

Cost: $

1359

Diego Nunes da Silva

Highest degree:

Bachelor's degree in Biology

Year obtained:

2018

Applicant Status:

Current student

Brazil

Flowering plants

Escola Nacional de Botânica Tropical / Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Fritzschia atropurpurea (Melastomataceae, Marcetieae): A New Species from the Serra do Cipó, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Systematic Botany 44(4): 844–850. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364419X15710776741512

Silva & al. (2019) First record of Fritzschia Cham. (Melastomataceae, Marcetieae) in the state of Bahia, Brazil. Check List 15(5): 753–758. https://doi.org/10.15560/15.5.753

BFG – The Brazil Flora Group (2018) Brazilian Flora 2020: Innovation and collaboration to meet Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC). Rodriguésia 69(4): 1513–1527. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860201869402

Silva & al. (2018) Chaetostoma hexapetalum (Microlicieae, Melastomataceae): A New Species from the Chapada dos Veadeiros, Goiás, Brazil. Systematic Botany 43(4): 986–992. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364418X697805

Referee 1:

Paulo José Fernandes Guimarães

Referee 2:

Fabián Armando Michelangeli

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

Scientific merit

 

1.  Contribution to novel methods for research in systematics and taxonomy and/or
     Building taxonomic capacity in developing countries

2.  Contribution to the generation of novel systematic data

3.  Quality and significance of questions being addressed

4.  Adequacy of methods for testing hypotheses (data collection/analysis/use of different tools)

This proposal scores:

/60

IAPT community building

 

5.  Student's potential for professional success

6.  Perceived need; extent to which the project will benefit from IAPT funding

This proposal scores:

/20

Broader Impacts

​​

7.  The research will yield durable benefits (revisions, databases, websites)

8.  Potential of the proposed project to generate an impactful publication

9.  The proposed research involves outreach/mentoring and broad dissemination

This proposal scores:

/20

Donate to IAPT when you shop on Amazon

Unless otherwise specified, content on this website is licensed under Creative Commons CC-BY. Please see our Terms of Use for more information.