Research Grants

This page is used to provide assessment scores for the grant. Please use the rubric below the grant details

to enter your assessment score

Impact of climatic niche on plant evolution: Systematic and phylogenetic
comparative studies in Miconia sect. Discolor (Miconieae, Melastoamtaceae)

Project summary:

Climatic niche shifts can impose novel selective regimes to plant species, leading them to either extinction or adaptation. In Neotropical lowlands, species within Miconia sect. Discolor have occupied vegetations under contrasting climates. The project aims to infer phylogenetic relationships of Amazonian lineages and assess selective regimes under different climatic niches.

Cost: $

820

Eduardo Koerich Nery

Highest degree:

Master's in Biology of Fungi, Algae, and Plants

Year obtained:

2019

Applicant Status:

Current student

Brazil

Flowering plants

Federal University of ABC

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

NERY, E. K.; VIEIRA, M. E. M.; CAMACHO, O.; CADDAH, M. K.; FIASCHI, P. Delimiting a constellation: Integrative taxonomy of a star-shaped Hydrocotyle species complex (Araliaceae) from the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Plant Systematics and Evolution, in press

NERY, E. K.; FIASCHI, P. Geometric morphometrics dismiss the polymorphic Hydrocotyle quinqueloba (Araliaceae) from the Neotropics. Systematic Botany, v. 44, p. 451-469, 2019.

BFG - The Brazil Flora Group; NERY, E. K. Brazilian Flora 2020: Innovation and collaboration to meet Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC). Rodriguesia, v. 69, p. 1513-1527, 2018.

Referee 1:

Pedro Fiaschi

Referee 2:

Mayara Krasinski Caddah

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

Scientific merit

 

1.  Contribution to novel methods for research in systematics and taxonomy and/or
     Building taxonomic capacity in developing countries

2.  Contribution to the generation of novel systematic data

3.  Quality and significance of questions being addressed

4.  Adequacy of methods for testing hypotheses (data collection/analysis/use of different tools)

This proposal scores:

/60

IAPT community building

 

5.  Student's potential for professional success

6.  Perceived need; extent to which the project will benefit from IAPT funding

This proposal scores:

/20

Broader Impacts

​​

7.  The research will yield durable benefits (revisions, databases, websites)

8.  Potential of the proposed project to generate an impactful publication

9.  The proposed research involves outreach/mentoring and broad dissemination

This proposal scores:

/20

Donate to IAPT when you shop on Amazon

Unless otherwise specified, content on this website is licensed under Creative Commons CC-BY. Please see our Terms of Use for more information.