Research Grants

This page is used to provide assessment scores for the grant. Please use the rubric below the grant details

to enter your assessment score

Project summary:

The large oil-secreting glands of the Neotropical Malpighiaceae may be absent or occur in smaller size or lower number in Galphimia clade, similar to many Paleotropical lineages. We here request the IAPT support for collect Galphimia in its centre of diversity in Mexico, in order to unravel the morphology, anatomy and evolution of floral glands in this key clade of the family.

Cost: $

2000

Miller Melo Sanches

Highest degree:

Master degree

Year obtained:

Year

Applicant Status:

Current student

Brazil

Flowering plants

Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

1) Sanches, MM. 2019. Floral secretory structures in Lophopterys floribunda W.R.Anderson & C.C.Davis (Malpighiaceae): insights,diversity, taxonomical significance and ecological role 32p. MsC Dissertation - Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG.

2) Almeida RF, Guesdon IR, Pace MR, Meira, Meira, RMSA. 2019. Taxonomic revision of Mcvaughia W.R.Anderson (Malpighiaceae): notes on vegetative and reproductive anatomy and the description of a new species. PhytoKeys 117: 45-72.

3) Guesdon IR, Amorim AMA, Meira, RMSA. 2019.Functional role and evolutionary contributions of floral gland morphoanatomy in the Paleotropical genus Acridocarpus (Malpighiaceae). PLoS One 14.

4) Guesdon IR, Amorim AMA, Meira, RMSA. 2018. The hydrochorous Amazonian genus Glandonia (Malpighiaceae): new records, morphoanatomy updates and taxonomic contributions. Phytotaxa.345: 13-25.

Referee 1:

Dr. Renata Maria Strozi Alves Meira

Referee 2:

Dr. Marcelo Rodrigo Pace

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

Scientific merit

 

1.  Contribution to novel methods for research in systematics and taxonomy and/or
     Building taxonomic capacity in developing countries

2.  Contribution to the generation of novel systematic data

3.  Quality and significance of questions being addressed

4.  Adequacy of methods for testing hypotheses (data collection/analysis/use of different tools)

This proposal scores:

/60

IAPT community building

 

5.  Student's potential for professional success

6.  Perceived need; extent to which the project will benefit from IAPT funding

This proposal scores:

/20

Broader Impacts

​​

7.  The research will yield durable benefits (revisions, databases, websites)

8.  Potential of the proposed project to generate an impactful publication

9.  The proposed research involves outreach/mentoring and broad dissemination

This proposal scores:

/20

Donate to IAPT when you shop on Amazon

Unless otherwise specified, content on this website is licensed under Creative Commons CC-BY. Please see our Terms of Use for more information.