Research Grants

This page is used to provide assessment scores for the grant. Please use the rubric below the grant details

to enter your assessment score

Biogeography, genetic diversity and evolution of the Australasian alpine Podocarpus species

Project summary:

Podocarpus lawrencei is an alpine conifer species and has close morpho-anatomical and genetic affinities with other species clade (P. lawrencei, P. nivalis, P. totara, P. gnidioides, P. laetus and P. acutifolius). This study will investigate the genetic structure and diversification this clade using Hybrid Capture-Based Next Generation Sequencing.

Cost: $

2000

Raees Khan

Highest degree:

M.Phil

Year obtained:

2017

Applicant Status:

Current student

Australia

Gymnosperms

University of Adelaide

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Khan, R., Abidin, S. Z. U., Ahmad, M., Zafar, M., Liu, J., Jamshed, S., & Kiliç, Ö. (2019). Taxonomic importance of SEM and LM foliar epidermal micro-morphology: A tool for robust identification of gymnosperms. Flora, 255, 42-68.

Khan, R., Ul, S. A., Ahmad, M., Zafar, M., Liu, J., & Amina, H. (2018). Palyno-morphological characteristics of gymnosperm flora of Pakistan and its taxonomic implications with LM and SEM methods. Microscopy research and technique, (81), 74–87.

Abidin, S. Z. U., Parveen, A., Khan, R., Ahmad, M., Khan, I. A., & Ali, Z. (2018). Chemical constituents from Ferula oopoda (Boiss. & Buhse) Boiss. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 78, 49-51.

Khan, R., Abidin, S. Z. U., Mumtaz, A. S., Altinordu, F., & Sennikov, A. (2017). Lectotypification of the Linnaean name Lobelia coronopifolia (Campanulaceae). Phytotaxa, 331(1), 144-146.

Referee 1:

Prof. Robert S. Hill

Referee 2:

Dr. Kathryn Hill

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

Scientific merit

 

1.  Contribution to novel methods for research in systematics and taxonomy and/or
     Building taxonomic capacity in developing countries

2.  Contribution to the generation of novel systematic data

3.  Quality and significance of questions being addressed

4.  Adequacy of methods for testing hypotheses (data collection/analysis/use of different tools)

This proposal scores:

/60

IAPT community building

 

5.  Student's potential for professional success

6.  Perceived need; extent to which the project will benefit from IAPT funding

This proposal scores:

/20

Broader Impacts

​​

7.  The research will yield durable benefits (revisions, databases, websites)

8.  Potential of the proposed project to generate an impactful publication

9.  The proposed research involves outreach/mentoring and broad dissemination

This proposal scores:

/20

Donate to IAPT when you shop on Amazon

Unless otherwise specified, content on this website is licensed under Creative Commons CC-BY. Please see our Terms of Use for more information.