Research Grants

This page is used to provide assessment scores for the grant. Please use the rubric below the grant details

to enter your assessment score

Islands within an island: origins, diversification, and endemism of the montane flora of Hispaniola

Project summary:

To provide insight into the processes contributing to exceptional endemism on insular mountains, I will study the evolutionary history of five species-rich vascular plant families on Hispaniola. Using a phylogenomic framework, I will investigate how immigration and in-situ radiations contribute to patterns of diversity and endemism observed on the island.

Cost: $

2000

Weston Testo

Highest degree:

Ph.D.

Year obtained:

2018

Applicant Status:

Early-career researcher (PhD obtained within last three years)

United States of America

Ferns and fern allies, Flowering plants, Fossils

University of Florida

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Testo, W. L., Sessa, E. B.., and Barrington, D. 2019. The rise of the Andes promoted rapid diversification in Neotropical Phlegmariurus (Lycopodiaceae). New Phytologist 222: 604–613.

Testo, W. L., Field, A.R., and Barrington, D. 2018. Overcoming among-lineage rate heterogeneity to infer the biogeography and divergence times of the clubmoss family Lycopodiaceae. Journal of Biogeography 45: 1929– 1941.

Testo, W. L., Øllgaard, B., Field, A. R., Almeida, T., Kessler, M., and Barrington, D. 2018. Phylogenetic systematics, morphological evolution, and natural groups in Neotropical Phlegmariurus (Lycopodiaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 125: 1–13.

Majure, L., Clase, T., Testo, W. L., Cinea, W., and Peguero, B. Nuevos reportes para la flora de La Española. Moscosoa, in press.

Referee 1:

Emily Sessa

Referee 2:

Lucas Majure

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

Scientific merit

 

1.  Contribution to novel methods for research in systematics and taxonomy and/or
     Building taxonomic capacity in developing countries

2.  Contribution to the generation of novel systematic data

3.  Quality and significance of questions being addressed

4.  Adequacy of methods for testing hypotheses (data collection/analysis/use of different tools)

This proposal scores:

/60

IAPT community building

 

5.  Student's potential for professional success

6.  Perceived need; extent to which the project will benefit from IAPT funding

This proposal scores:

/20

Broader Impacts

​​

7.  The research will yield durable benefits (revisions, databases, websites)

8.  Potential of the proposed project to generate an impactful publication

9.  The proposed research involves outreach/mentoring and broad dissemination

This proposal scores:

/20

Donate to IAPT when you shop on Amazon

Unless otherwise specified, content on this website is licensed under Creative Commons CC-BY. Please see our Terms of Use for more information.