Biodiversity Challenge
This page is used to provide assessment scores for the grant. Please use the rubric below the grant details
to enter your assessment score
Phylogenetic and taxonomic knowledge on Malaysian Acanthaceae
Project summary:
Acanthaceae is one of pan-tropical flowering plants and most of the species were centralized in Old World (OW) regions including Malaysia. However, we still lack of knowledge on the natural history of the species. Nevertheless, many reports have been published on the medicinal value of the species. Therefore, it shows that the knowledge on the natural history of the species including identification is very important in order to ensure the medicinal properties and the species reported is comparable. Hence, this project is conducted to fill in the knowledge gap on the Malaysian Acanthaceae.
Siti Fatimah Md Isa
Team Members
Malaysia
Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS)
Elia Godoong
Malaysia
Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS)
Che Nurul Aini Che Amri
Malaysia
International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM)
Referee 1:
Carrie A. Kiel
Referee 2:
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Normah Awang Besar @ Raffie
Referees
Scoring Rubric
Reviewer name:
1. Collection generation/improvement/maintenance (10 points available total)
(1a) contribution of physical and/or digital images of specimens (10 points)
or
(1b) infrastructure improvements including enhanced access to the physical collections, database development, database enhancement, digitization (10 points)
or
(1c) improvements to the physical collections (for example, better folders, better glue, paper, pest management, storage systems) (10 points)
or
(1d) distribution of duplicates (or orphan collections) to other regional or international herbaria (10 points)
2. Methods and funding consistency (10 points)
How well do the methods and funds requested match the effort needed to achieve the objectives?
3. Perceived need (10 points)
Score Small Collections Initiative applications here [30 points total]
(see below for Taxonomy and Systematics rubric)
Initiative for this application:
Taxonomic and Systematic Initiative
Reviewers should assign a score of 1 to 10 to each of the following three items (1 being poorly implemented, 10 superbly planned), plus a one-sentence comment detailing the score.
1. Originality of the proposal (10 points)
How well does the proposal advance knowledge in terms of a biodiversity perspective as well as from a taxonomic and systematic perspective?
Reviewers should assign a score of 1 to 10 to each of the following three items (1 being poorly implemented, 10 superbly planned), plus a one-sentence comment detailing the score.
Score Taxonomy and Systematics applications here [50 points total]
(see above for Small Collections Initiative rubric)
2. Training (10 points available total)
(2a) Training of staff and students (10 points)
or
(2b) Outreach and/or community activities (10 points)
This proposal scores:
/10
This proposal scores:
/10
This proposal scores:
/10
This proposal scores:
/10
This proposal scores:
/10
This proposal scores:
/10
5. Training (10 points total)
(5a) Training of staff and students (10 points)
or
(5b) Outreach and/or community activities (10 points)
4. Qualification of the team (10 points)
Based on reference letters and CVs
3. Perceived need (10 points total)
(3a) Demonstrated need and discussion of threat and/or understudied taxa (10 points)
or
(3b) Vanishing taxonomic expertise (10 points)
This proposal scores:
/10
This proposal scores:
/10
Flowering plants
Cost: $
9547
