top of page

Research Grants

This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.

Genetic diversity and population disjunction studies of Indianthus virgatus: A critical approach to conserve a rare monotypic endemic species

Project summary:

This study explores the genetic diversity, phylogeography, and population disjunction of Indianthus virgatus, a rare monotypic plant endemic to the Western Ghats and Sri Lanka biodiversity hotspot. Using Genome Wide Association studies, it investigates vicariance, dispersal mechanisms, and conservation significance, emphasizing the need for preserving this highly restricted species and its relict habitats.

First Name:

Vishnu Shreekara Bhat K

Highest degree:

Master of Science

Year obtained:

2022

Applicant Status:

Current student

India

Flowering plants

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Vishnu, S. B., Pandi, V., Madola, I., Gopallawa, B., Abraham, G. A., Gayathri, R., Yakandawala, D., & Muthusamy, A. (2024). Modeling the Current and Future Distribution of Indianthus virgatus (Roxb.) Suksathan & Borchs.: A Monotypic Plant Endemic to the Western Ghats‐Sri Lanka Biodiversity Hotspot. Ecology and Evolution, 14(10), e70489.

Applicant Details

email:

Country:

Target organism/s:

Previous publications

Budget (USD):

2000

Manipal Centre for Natural Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education

Affiliation:

Grant Assessment

Last Name:

Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?

Year of previous application:

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

c1. Scientific Merit

 

  • Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points

  • Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points

  • Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points

  • Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/35

C2. Community Building

 

  • Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points

  • Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points

  • Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points

This proposal scores:

/25

C3. Broader Impacts

​

  • The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points

  • The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits  – up to 10 points

  • The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange  – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/40

bottom of page