Research Grants
This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.
Phylogeographic analysis of the Poidium calotheca complex (Poaceae) in the Neotropical region
Project summary:
The project aims to estimate genetic diversity and understand the genetic structuring of P. calotheca complex populations using a next-generation sequence approach to investigate relationships among the complex's taxa, aiming for a better comprehension of the group's taxonomy and systematic.
First Name:
Taciane Schröder Jorge
Highest degree:
B.Sc. in Biology
Year obtained:
2022
Applicant Status:
Current student
Brazil
Flowering plants
Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):
Brazil Flora Group. 2022. Brazilian Flora 2020: Leveraging the power of a collaborative scientific network. Taxon, 71(1): 178-198.
Schröder, T., Thode, V.A., Silva, L.N., Chies, T. 2023. Filogenia datada de Calothecinae (Poaceae, Pooideae, Poeae). In: II Encontro de Botânicos da Região Sul, 2023. Anais do II Encontro de Botânicos da Região Sul.
Schröder, T., Iganci, J. 2022. Avaliação do estado de conservação das gramíneas endêmicas do bioma Pampa. 8ª Semana Integrada de Inovação, Ensino, Pesquisa e Extensão – UFPel.
Jorge, T. S., Lessa, I. M., Iganci, J. 2018. Conexões florísticas em ambientes campestres: campos de altitude. 4ª Semana Integrada de Inovação, Ensino, Pesquisa e Extensão – UFPel.
Applicant Details
email:
Country:
Target organism/s:
Previous publications
Budget (USD):
2000
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
Affiliation:
Grant Assessment
Last Name:
Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?
Year of previous application:
Scoring Rubric
Your name:
c1. Scientific Merit
-
Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points
-
Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points
-
Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points
-
Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points
This proposal scores:
/35
C2. Community Building
-
Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points
-
Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points
-
Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points
This proposal scores:
/25
C3. Broader Impacts
-
The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points
-
The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits – up to 10 points
-
The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange – up to 10 points
This proposal scores:
/40