Research Grants
This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.
Lindsaeaceae in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia: systematics, gametophytes and conservation
Project summary:
This study is the first integrative taxonomic revision of the fern family Lindsaeaceae in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia, combining morphological, anatomical, and molecular approaches. It examines the gametophyte and sporophyte stages, rhizome and stipe anatomy, and phylogenetic relationships. By analyzing community distributions, the research will uncover fern life cycle dynamics and may develop a novel IUCN extinction risk assessment guideline. This study could provide a crucial foundation for fern taxonomy, ecology, and conservation in Southeast Asia’s threatened biodiversity hotspots.
First Name:
Nguyen Khanh Trinh Tram
Highest degree:
Master of Science
Year obtained:
2024
Applicant Status:
Current student
Finland
Ferns and fern allies
Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):
Nguyen Khanh Trinh Tram (2024). A morphological study of pteridophyte gametophytes in riparian areas in Cat Tien National Park, Vietnam. Master’s thesis of VNUHCM-University of Science [in English].
Applicant Details
email:
Country:
Target organism/s:
Previous publications
Budget (USD):
1999
Biodiversity Unit, University of Turku
Affiliation:
Grant Assessment
Last Name:
Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?
Year of previous application:
Scoring Rubric
Your name:
c1. Scientific Merit
-
Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points
-
Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points
-
Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points
-
Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points
This proposal scores:
/35
C2. Community Building
-
Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points
-
Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points
-
Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points
This proposal scores:
/25
C3. Broader Impacts
-
The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points
-
The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits – up to 10 points
-
The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange – up to 10 points
This proposal scores:
/40