top of page

Research Grants

This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.

Morphological reassessment of taxonomic boundaries of Indian Urticaceae: A Baseline for conservation and phylogenomic analyses

Project summary:

This proposal seeks funding to visit Kew Herbarium to study type specimens and historic collections of the neglected Indian Urticaceae (the nettle family). The study aims to resolve taxonomic boundaries, nomenclature, typification, and conservation status while establishing collaboration with international Urticaceae specialists for future molecular phylogenomic studies.

First Name:

JEOMOL

Highest degree:

Ph.D

Year obtained:

2025

Applicant Status:

Early-career researcher (PhD obtained within the last 12 months)

India

Flowering plants

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Jeomol K.K. & P. Sunoj Kumar. 2023. Robert Wight names and types in Pouzolzia (Urticaceae) published in Icones plantarum Indiae orientalis. Taxon 73(1): 249–268.

Jeomol K.K. & P. Sunoj Kumar. 2023. Typifications and Nomenclatural notes on Old World names in Boehmeria (Urticaceae). Novon 31: 139–153.

Jeomol K.K. & P. Sunoj Kumar. 2023. Typifications and a new synonym in the tribe Boehmerieae (Urticaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 2023(11): e03950.

Jeomol K.K. & P. Sunoj Kumar. 2020. Elatostema agasthyanum: a new lithophythic species from southern Western Ghats, India. Phytotaxa 430(1):033–040.

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

c1. Scientific Merit

 

  • Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points

  • Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points

  • Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points

  • Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/35

C2. Community Building

 

  • Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points

  • Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points

  • Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points

This proposal scores:

/25

C3. Broader Impacts

  • The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points

  • The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits  – up to 10 points

  • The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange  – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/40

Applicant Details

email:

Country:

Target organism/s:

Previous publications

Budget (USD):

2000

UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT

Affiliation:

Grant Assessment

Last Name:

K K

Yes, and it was successful

Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?

Year of previous application:

2023

bottom of page