top of page

Research Grants

This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.

Exploring the gaps in the Systematics of Marcetieae (Melastomataceae): a phylogenetic approach focusing on Ernestia and Macairea

Project summary:

Marcetieae is a tribe of Melastomataceae with distribution in the Meso- and Neotropical regions. Despite recent advances in the systematics of the tribe, Macairea and Ernestia remain as non-monophyletic genera. In this context, this project aims to complete the phylogenetic tree of Marcetieae from the taxa known to both genera.

First Name:

Diego Nunes da Silva

Highest degree:

MSc in Botany

Year obtained:

2020

Applicant Status:

Current student

Brazil

Flowering plants

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Rocha MJR, Silva DN, Romero R & Guimarães PJF (2020) Flora da Serra do Cipó, Minas Gerais: Marcetieae (Melastomataceae). Boletim de Botânica da USP 28(1): 15–31. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9052.v38p15-31

Silva DN, Rocha MJR & Guimarães PJF (2019) Fritzschia atropurpurea (Melastomataceae, Marcetieae): A new species from the Serra do Cipó, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Systematic Botany 44(4): 844–850. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364419X15710776741512

BFG – The Brazil Flora Group (2018) Brazilian Flora 2020: Innovation and collaboration to meet Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC). Rodriguésia 69(4): 1513–1527. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860201869402

Silva DN, Diniz DO, Koschnitzke C, Guimarães PJF, Silva MJ & Maia VH (2018) Chaetostoma hexapetalum (Microlicieae, Melastomataceae): A new species from the Chapada dos Veadeiros, Goiás, Brazil. Systematic Botany 43(4): 986–992. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364418X697805

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

c1. Scientific Merit

 

  • Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points

  • Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points

  • Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points

  • Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/35

C2. Community Building

 

  • Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points

  • Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points

  • Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points

This proposal scores:

/25

C3. Broader Impacts

  • The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points

  • The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits  – up to 10 points

  • The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange  – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/40

Applicant Details

email:

Country:

Target organism/s:

Previous publications

Budget (USD):

2000

Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro

Affiliation:

Grant Assessment

Last Name:

Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?

Year of previous application:

bottom of page