Research Grants
This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.
Untangling the Mechanism of Gene Flow among Groundcherry Species (Physalis L., Solanaceae)
Project summary:
This project will study the incongruence within Physalis. This will be done by determining if the irregular breakdown of self-incompatibility causes occasional hybridization.
First Name:
Chelsea Pretz
Highest degree:
Bachelors of Science
Year obtained:
2015
Applicant Status:
Current student
USA
Flowering plants
Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):
Pretz, C. and Deanna, R. 2020. Lectotypifications and nomenclatural notes in Physalis (Solanaceae) from North America. Taxon. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12159.
Pretz, C. 2019. The Breakdown of Self-incompatibility. The Physalis Project Blog. Dec. 2019. (not-peer reviewed)
Scoring Rubric
Your name:
c1. Scientific Merit
-
Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points
-
Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points
-
Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points
-
Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points
This proposal scores:
/35
C2. Community Building
-
Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points
-
Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points
-
Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points
This proposal scores:
/25
C3. Broader Impacts
-
The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points
-
The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits – up to 10 points
-
The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange – up to 10 points
This proposal scores:
/40
Applicant Details
email:
Country:
Target organism/s:
Previous publications
Budget (USD):
2000
University of Colorado, Boulder
Affiliation:
Grant Assessment
Last Name:
Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?
Year of previous application: