top of page

Research Grants

This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.

Global phylogeny, evolution and biodiversity of open-ocean phytoplankton genus Gephyrocapsa

Project summary:

The coccolithophore genus Gephyrocapsa is of great ecological importance in the ocean ecology and the climate system. This project aims to obtain a comprehensive understanding of its phylogeny, evolution and biodiversity though ingtergrating morphological evidence with genomic data. The study will enhance understanding of its ecological roles and predict biodiversity impacts from climate change.

First Name:

Sisi Chen

Highest degree:

Master

Year obtained:

2022

Applicant Status:

Current student

England

Algae

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Chen, S, Wang, T, Shu, J, Xiang, Q, Yang, T, Zhang, X & Yan, Y 2022, ‘Plastid Phylogenomics and
Plastomic Diversity of the Extant Lycophytes’, Genes, vol. 13, no. 7, p. 1280.

Chen, S, Zhang, M, Wang, J & Zhang, X 2021, ‘Original Plant and Research Progress of the
Medicinal Plant Huperzia javanica’, Guihaia, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 1794-1809.

Wang, T, Li, T, Chen, S, Yang, T, Shu, J, Mu Y, Wang, K, Chen, J, Xiang, J & Yan, Y 2022,
‘Untying the Gordian knot of plastid phylogenomic conflict: A case from ferns’, Frontiers in Plant
Science, vol. 13, no. 918155.

Wang, T, Liu, L, Luo, J, Gu, Y, Chen, S, Liu, B, Shang, H & Yan, Y 2021, ‘Finding Hidden Outliers
to Promote the Consistency of Key Morphological Traits and Phylogeny in Dennstaedtiaceae’,
Taxonomy, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 256-265.

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

c1. Scientific Merit

 

  • Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points

  • Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points

  • Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points

  • Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/35

C2. Community Building

 

  • Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points

  • Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points

  • Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points

This proposal scores:

/25

C3. Broader Impacts

  • The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points

  • The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits  – up to 10 points

  • The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange  – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/40

Applicant Details

email:

Country:

Target organism/s:

Previous publications

Budget (USD):

2000

University of Oxford

Affiliation:

Grant Assessment

Last Name:

Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?

Year of previous application:

0

bottom of page