top of page

Research Grants

This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.

Diversity and distribution of Andean Megalastrum in Ecuador

Project summary:

The project aims to study the fern genus Megalastrum in Ecuador, the country with the highest richness within the genus, by increasing fieldwork sampling and reviewing herbaria specimens. Besides incorporation of more recent collections, new genomic data will be obtained through the sequencing of species not previously studied.

First Name:

David Gutierrez Duque

Highest degree:

Undergraduate

Year obtained:

2024

Applicant Status:

Current student

Brazil

Ferns and fern allies

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Orozco-Arias, S.; Dupeyron, M. Gutiérrez-Duque, D.; Tabares-Soto, R. & Guyot, R. 2023. High nucleotide similarity of three Copia lineage LTR retrotransposons among plant genomes. Genome 66(3): 51-61 https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2022-0026

Gutiérrez-Duque, D.; Prieto-Luna, J. A., Andrade-Ramos, M. J., Sierra-Giraldo, J. A., & Feuillet-Hurtado, C. 2024. Composición, estructura y diversidad florística del bosque Monteleón: Un relicto urbano del bosque subandino (Manizales, Colombia). Colombia Forestal 27(1): e20968 https://doi.org/10.14483/2256201X.20968

Cornejo, X.; Gutiérrez-Duque, D.; Arango-González, J. S.; Sierra-Giraldo, J. A. & Medellin-Zabala, D. 2023. Gustavia montana (Lecythidaceae): A New Species from the Andes in Colombia. Harvard Papers in Botany 28(2): 647-653 https://doi.org/10.3100/hpib.v28iss2.2023.n2

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

c1. Scientific Merit

 

  • Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points

  • Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points

  • Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points

  • Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/35

C2. Community Building

 

  • Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points

  • Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points

  • Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points

This proposal scores:

/25

C3. Broader Impacts

  • The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points

  • The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits  – up to 10 points

  • The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange  – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/40

Applicant Details

email:

Country:

Target organism/s:

Previous publications

Budget (USD):

1985

Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Affiliation:

Grant Assessment

Last Name:

Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?

Year of previous application:

bottom of page