top of page

Research Grants

This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.

Establishing the foundation stone around an understudied family in Ecuador: a taxonomic revision of neotropical Caryophyllaceae towards a new volume of the series Flora of Ecuador

Project summary:

Caryophyllaceae in Ecuador is poorly sampled and lacks a comprehensive taxonomic revision. This project proposes an integrated morphological, nomenclatural, geospatial, and conservational study of all genera; based on herbaria revision and fieldwork, to update taxonomy, distribution, and conservation status of around 52 species.

First Name:

Emilio

Highest degree:

Bachelor of Science

Year obtained:

2025

Applicant Status:

Other

Ecuador

Flowering plants

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Trujillo EJ, Muriel P (2025) Arenaria nana is the correct name instead of A. muscoides
(Caryophyllaceae) for a Critically Endangered endemic species of Ecuador. Phytotaxa 736 (2):
183–186. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.736.2.7

Trujillo EJ, Muriel P (2025). Nomenclatural notes in Arenaria (Caryophyllaceae) from the
Páramos of Ecuador. Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, 19(4), 607–610.
https://doi.org/10.17348/jbrit.v19.i4.1444

Trujillo EJ, Romoleroux K, Muriel P (2025) New records of Nototriche hartwegii A.W.Hill
(Malvaceae, Malvoideae) in Ecuador: updated distribution and range extension. Check List 21 (5):
778-783. https://doi.org/10.15560/21.5.778

Trujillo EJ, Espinel-Ortiz DA, Romoleroux K, Muriel P (2025). A new species of Nototriche
(Malvaceae, Malvoideae) from the high Andes of Ecuador PhytoKeys 261: 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.261.157043

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

c1. Scientific Merit

 

  • Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points

  • Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points

  • Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points

  • Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/35

C2. Community Building

 

  • Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points

  • Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points

  • Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points

This proposal scores:

/25

C3. Broader Impacts

  • The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points

  • The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits  – up to 10 points

  • The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange  – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/40

Applicant Details

email:

Country:

Target organism/s:

Previous publications

Budget (USD):

2000

Herbario QCA, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Naturales y Ambientales, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador

Affiliation:

Grant Assessment

Last Name:

Trujillo

Yes, but it was unsuccessful

Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?

Year of previous application:

2023

bottom of page