top of page

Research Grants

This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.

Development of non-glandular and glandular trichomes within flowers of selected Pinguicula species.

Project summary:

The aim of this project is to show anatomy and micromorphology at each developmental stage of non-glandular and glandular trichomes located within flowers of P. agnata, P. moranensis and P. vulgaris. We would like to compare trichomes development processes of these species, in order to establish differences and similarities.

First Name:

Krzysztof Lustofin

Highest degree:

MSc degree

Year obtained:

2018

Applicant Status:

Current student

Poland

Flowering plants

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Lustofin K, Świątek P, Miranda VFO, Płachno BJ. 2020. Flower nectar trichome structure of carnivorous plants from the genus butterworts Pinguicula L. (Lentibulariaceae). Protoplasma 257: 245-259. Doi: 10.1007/s00709-019-01433-8

Pawlicki P, Hejmej A, Miłoń A, Lustofin K, Płachno BJ, Tworzydło W, Górowska-Wójtowicz E, Pawlicka B, Kotula-Balak M, Bilińska B. 2019. Telocytes in the mouse testicular interstitium. Implications of G-protein coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) and estrogen related receptor (ERR) in regulation of Mouse testicular interstitial cells. Protoplasma 256: 393-408. Doi: 10.1007/s00709-018-1305-2

Lustofin K. 2019. Szkodliwy wpływ flutamidu na układ rozrodczy ssaków. Wszechświat 120(1-3):39-46.

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

c1. Scientific Merit

 

  • Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points

  • Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points

  • Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points

  • Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/35

C2. Community Building

 

  • Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points

  • Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points

  • Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points

This proposal scores:

/25

C3. Broader Impacts

  • The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points

  • The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits  – up to 10 points

  • The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange  – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/40

Applicant Details

email:

Country:

Target organism/s:

Previous publications

Budget (USD):

1810

Jagiellonian University in Cracow, Intitute of Botany, Department of Plant Cytology and Embryology

Affiliation:

Grant Assessment

Last Name:

Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?

Year of previous application:

bottom of page