Research Grants
This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.
Systematic Studies in the Stilpnopappus Alliance (Asteraceae, Vernonieae)
Project summary:
This proposal has as its main objective to obtain DNA samples to test the monophyly of four genera of the Stilpnopappus Alliance, in addition to providing a taxonomic review of the five genera of this alliance. It also seeks to investigate the evolution of the pappus and conduct a biogeographic study to understand the distribution of the species.
First Name:
Danielle Remor
Highest degree:
Master in Botany
Year obtained:
2023
Applicant Status:
Current student
Brazil
Flowering plants
Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):
REMOR, DANIELLE; BERNARDO DE A. BRINGEL JR., JOÃO ; FLORIANO B. PASTORE, JOSÉ . A new combination in Wedelia (Asteraceae-Heliantheae-Ecliptinae) from Brazil. Phytotaxa, v. 545, p. 103-109, 2022
REMOR, DANIELLE; BERNARDO DE A. BRINGEL JR., JOÃO ; Bueno, V.R. ; NAKAJIMA, J. ; PEIREIRA., R. C. A. . Solving another old and small problem: a new combination in Ichthyothere (Asteraceae, Millerieae) and the recognition of a name described by Vellozo. BRITTONIA, p. 1-7, 2022
REMOR, DANIELLE; DE AZEVEDO BRINGEL JR., JOÃO BERNARDO ; PASTORE, JOSÉ FLORIANO BARÊA . The correct authorship of Caleacte, Calea pinnatifida and C. urticifolia (Compositae). Phytotaxa, v. 637, p. 296-299, 2024
REMOR, DANIELLE; PASTORE, JOSÉ FLORIANO BARÊA ; PERALTA, DENILSON FERNANDES . Levantamento das briófitas da trilha do Pessegueirinho, Curitibanos, Estado de Santa Catarina, Brasil. HOEHNEA, v. 48, p. 01-14, 2021
Applicant Details
email:
Country:
Target organism/s:
Previous publications
Budget (USD):
2000
Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana
Affiliation:
Grant Assessment
Last Name:
Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?
2024
Year of previous application:
Scoring Rubric
Your name:
c1. Scientific Merit
-
Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points
-
Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points
-
Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points
-
Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points
This proposal scores:
/35
C2. Community Building
-
Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points
-
Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points
-
Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points
This proposal scores:
/25
C3. Broader Impacts
-
The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points
-
The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits – up to 10 points
-
The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange – up to 10 points
This proposal scores:
/40