Research Grants
This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.
Review of the Vellozo’s Leguminosae in Florae Fluminensis from Cunha
(São Paulo, Brazil)
Project summary:
This project aims to review the names of Leguminosae, described or cited by Conceição-Vellozo in
Florae Fluminensis likely from the municipality of Cunha-SP. This project, includes a fieldwork in
order to provide a reference collection, mainly with specimens of Leguminosae, from the adjacent
region of the Royal road in Cunha, where were likely the historic sites visited by Conceição-Vellozo.
First Name:
Helen Fernandes de Menezes
Highest degree:
Bachelor
Year obtained:
2017
Applicant Status:
Current student
Brazil
Flowering plants
Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):
MENEZES, H. F. & ESSI, L. 2016. Leguminosas Campestres do Morro Pedra do Lagarto, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Balduínia, n.55, p.23-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/2358198024711
Applicant Details
email:
Country:
Target organism/s:
Previous publications
Budget (USD):
1942
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Affiliation:
Grant Assessment
Last Name:
Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?
Year of previous application:
Scoring Rubric
Your name:
c1. Scientific Merit
-
Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points
-
Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points
-
Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points
-
Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points
This proposal scores:
/35
C2. Community Building
-
Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points
-
Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points
-
Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points
This proposal scores:
/25
C3. Broader Impacts
-
The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points
-
The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits – up to 10 points
-
The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange – up to 10 points
This proposal scores:
/40