top of page

Research Grants

This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.

Systematics of Passiflora supersections Coccinea and Distephana (Passifloraceae s.s.) from Brazil

Project summary:

The red-flowered Passiflora L. species are notable by their exuberant scarlet flowers, leaf shape, and speckled, variegated, juicy fruit. These supersections have a controversial circumscription because they lack a revision of species, consistent identification of complex taxa, and morphological detailing. In addition, palynological studies provide valuable support for the classification of passionflowers. In this regard, this project aims to evaluate the circumscription of the Brazilian species and provide new taxonomic and palynological records.

First Name:

Artur Manoel Leite Medeiros

Highest degree:

Biological sciences (Botany) master’ degree

Year obtained:

2020

Applicant Status:

Current student

Brazil

Flowering plants

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

FARIA, C. G.; SILVA, A. S.; MELO, R. K. P.; MEDEIROS, A. M. L.; DONATO, A. M.; COSTA, A. F.; HAIAD, B. S. Leaf anatomy of Vriesea (Tillandsioideae-Bromeliaceae). Brittonia, v. 10, p. 1-26, 2021.

FERREIRA, R. O.; BORGES, A. C.; CAMPOS, J.; MEDEIROS, A. M. L.; SAKURAGUI, C. M.; VIEIRA, R. C.; TENORIO, V. Anatomy of the adventitious roots of Philodendron (Araceae) and its importance for the systematics of the genus. Australian Systematic Botany, v. 33, p. 207, 2020.

MEDEIROS, A. M. L.; MARQUES, C. A. Morphological analysis of starch granules in flours and other foods in the Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil. Perspectivas da Ciência e Tecnologia, v. 11, p. 128, 2019.

TENORIO, V.; COUTO, R. S.; ALBUQUERQUE, E. S. B.; MEDEIROS, A. M. L.; FERREIRA, R. O.; BRAGA, J. M. A.; VIEIRA, R. C. Stem anatomy of neotropical Dioscorea L. (Dioscoreaceae) and its importance to the systematics of the genus. Plant Systematics and Evolution, v. 303, p. 1-12, 2017.

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

c1. Scientific Merit

 

  • Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points

  • Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points

  • Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points

  • Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/35

C2. Community Building

 

  • Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points

  • Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points

  • Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points

This proposal scores:

/25

C3. Broader Impacts

  • The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points

  • The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits  – up to 10 points

  • The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange  – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/40

Applicant Details

email:

Country:

Target organism/s:

Previous publications

Budget (USD):

2000

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Affiliation:

Grant Assessment

Last Name:

Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?

Year of previous application:

bottom of page