top of page

Research Grants

This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.

Systematics of the genus Parasopubia (Orobanchaceae)

Project summary:

An integrative approach based on morphological, molecular, anatomical, and micro morphological data will definitely helps to produce a stable classification for the genus Parasopubia. The grant money is planned to collect all available specimens of Parasopubia and to establish collaboration with a world specialist (Dr. Gerald M. Schneeweiss, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna), for analysis of phylogenetic data.

First Name:

DIVYA K. VENUGOPAL

Highest degree:

M Sc

Year obtained:

2016

Applicant Status:

Current student

India

Flowering plants

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Asyneuma cupulare, a new species of Campanulaceae from southern Western Ghats, India and lectotypification of Campanula fulgens (Asyneuma fulgens)
Divya K. Venugopal, Santhosh Nampy, Vishnu Mohan and Dani Francis. Nordic Journal of Botany 39(1):1‒7, 2021.

Notes on taxonomic Identity and typification of Fagraea coromandelina (Gentianaceae)
Divya K. Venugopal, Dani Francis, Vishnu Mohan & Santhosh Nampy. Phytotaxa 360 (3): 292-295, 2018

New record of Iochroma arborescens (Solanaceae) for India, a potential invasive plant from America with notes on its typification
Santhosh Nampy, Divya K. Venugopal, Dani Francis & Vishnu Mohan Rheedea 29(3): 222–226, 2019

Two new scapigerous species of Impatiens (Balsaminaceae) from southern Western Ghats, India
Mohan Vishnu, Divya K. Venugopal, Dani Francis, Santhosh Nampy. Taiwania 65(2): 187‒194, 2020

Applicant Details

email:

Country:

Target organism/s:

Previous publications

Budget (USD):

2000

UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT

Affiliation:

Grant Assessment

Last Name:

Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?

Year of previous application:

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

c1. Scientific Merit

 

  • Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points

  • Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points

  • Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points

  • Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/35

C2. Community Building

 

  • Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points

  • Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points

  • Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points

This proposal scores:

/25

C3. Broader Impacts

  • The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points

  • The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits  – up to 10 points

  • The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange  – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/40

bottom of page