top of page

Research Grants

This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.

Taxonomic revision and achene micro-morphology of the genus Elatostema
(Urticaceae) in India

Project summary:

This project aims to provide a comprehensive taxonomic revision of the largest non-stinging genus Elatostema (Urticaceae) in India, supported by achene micromorphology which will be the first attempts towards systematics of the family Urticaceae in India. The grant would help to cover the costs associated with herbaria visits, field collections and SEM analysis and to develop collaboration with Urticaceae specialists.

First Name:

JEOMOL K K

Highest degree:

MASTER OF SCIENCE (BOTANY)

Year obtained:

2014

Applicant Status:

Current student

INDIA

Flowering plants

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Jeomol K.K. & P. Sunoj Kumar. 2020. Elatostema agasthyanum: a new lithophythic species
from southern Western Ghats, India. Phytotaxa 430(1):033–040.

Jeomol K.K. & P. Sunoj Kumar. 2020. Pilea hyalina (Urticaceae), a new record for Asia
from Peninsular India. Rheedea 30(2): 299–306

Jeomol K.K. & P. Sunoj Kumar. Typification of five names in the genus Pilea (Urticaceae)-communicated to Kew Bulletin

Jeomol K.K. & P. Sunoj Kumar. Typification of names in the genus Elatostema (Urticaceae)-in press

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

c1. Scientific Merit

 

  • Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points

  • Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points

  • Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points

  • Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/35

C2. Community Building

 

  • Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points

  • Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points

  • Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points

This proposal scores:

/25

C3. Broader Impacts

  • The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points

  • The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits  – up to 10 points

  • The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange  – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/40

Applicant Details

email:

Country:

Target organism/s:

Previous publications

Budget (USD):

2000

UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT

Affiliation:

Grant Assessment

Last Name:

Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?

Year of previous application:

bottom of page