Research Grants
This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.
Evolution and diversification of Silene (Caryophyllaceae) in North Africa.
Project summary:
This project aims to understand the phylogenetic relationship and species richness within the genus Silene in North Africa. The taxa in this region show a complex diversification where we need to propose a well-supported phylogeny and using integrated morphological trait-based analysis, especially in the early-diverging branches.
First Name:
Melilia Mesbah
Highest degree:
Master
Year obtained:
2016
Applicant Status:
Current student
Algeria
Flowering plants
Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):
Mesbah M, Bekdouche F, Laidi K, Sahnoune M, Véla E. 2020. Silene auriculifolia. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020:e.T156127607A156127637.
Mesbah M, Bekdouche F, Laidi K, Sahnoune M, Véla E. 2020. Silene aristidis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020:e.T135259613A135259617.
Mesbah M., Bekdouche F., Véla E. & Sahnoune M., 2019 – Silene sessionis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2019 (3): e.T72458759A72458763.
• Moiloa NA., Mesbah M., Forest F., Manning JC., Bacon CD., Oxelman B., 2019.
Phylogenetic placement and biogeographic origins of southern African Silene L. At: 45th Annual Congress of the South African Association of Botanists. Johannesburg, South Africa. 8-11 January 2019.
Applicant Details
email:
Country:
Target organism/s:
Previous publications
Budget (USD):
2000
University of Bejaia- Algeria
Affiliation:
Grant Assessment
Last Name:
Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?
Year of previous application:
Scoring Rubric
Your name:
c1. Scientific Merit
-
Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points
-
Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points
-
Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points
-
Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points
This proposal scores:
/35
C2. Community Building
-
Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points
-
Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points
-
Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points
This proposal scores:
/25
C3. Broader Impacts
-
The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points
-
The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits – up to 10 points
-
The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange – up to 10 points
This proposal scores:
/40

