top of page

Research Grants

This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.

Taxonomic revision and phylogenetic systematics of the subtribe Gonolobinae Liede (Apocynaceae, Asclepiadoideae) in southern Brazil

Project summary:

This project investigates the taxonomy and evolutionary relationships of Gonolobinae (Apocynaceae) in southern Brazil through fieldwork, herbarium studies, and chloroplast DNA phylogenetics. It aims to clarify species delimitations, update generic boundaries, produce identification tools, and fill major knowledge gaps for poorly known taxa, supporting biodiversity research and conservation efforts.

First Name:

Willian

Highest degree:

MSc

Year obtained:

2023

Applicant Status:

Current student

Porto Alegre

Flowering plants

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

PIOVESANI, W. S.; FERREIRA, P. P. A.; SEGER, G. D. S. 2024. Clematis serrana (Ranunculaceae), a new endemic species to the Atlantic Forest highlands in Southern Brazil. Phytotaxa 660: 149-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.660.2.5

PIOVESANI, W. S.; FERREIRA, P. P. A.; SEGER, G. D. S. 2025. A comprehensive description and range extension of the formerly Bolivian endemic Clematis uruboensis (Ranunculaceae) to Brazil. Phytotaxa 706: 281-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.706.3.6

PIOVESANI, W. S.; FERREIRA, P.P.A.; SEGER, G.D.S. 2026 (in press). The Genus Clematis (Ranunculaceae) in Brazil. Systematic Botany.

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

c1. Scientific Merit

 

  • Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points

  • Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points

  • Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points

  • Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/35

C2. Community Building

 

  • Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points

  • Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points

  • Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points

This proposal scores:

/25

C3. Broader Impacts

  • The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points

  • The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits  – up to 10 points

  • The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange  – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/40

Applicant Details

email:

Country:

Target organism/s:

Previous publications

Budget (USD):

2000

UFRGS

Affiliation:

Grant Assessment

Last Name:

Piovesani

Yes, but it was unsuccessful

Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?

Year of previous application:

2025

bottom of page