Research Grants
This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.
Diversification patterns of the tribe Sauvagesieae (Ochnaceae)
Project summary:
We aim to use a robust and widely-sampled phylogeny, and quantitative methods to assess the relationships between diversification dynamics and trait evolution in the tribe Sauvagesieae (Ochnaceae), attempting to contribute to an integrative understanding of the evolutionary mechanisms that have configured the flora in biodiversity hotspots of South America
First Name:
Sandra Reinales
Highest degree:
Master of Science
Year obtained:
2019
Applicant Status:
Current student
Brazil
Flowering plants
Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):
Reinales S & Parra-O. C. 2020. Phylogenetic position and evolution of glandular structures of the unusual and narrowly-distributed genus <i>Rhytidanthera</i> (Ochnaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, DOI:10.1093/botlinnean/boaa008.
Reinales S & Parra-O. C. in prep. Taxonomic revision of the genus <i>Rhytidanthera</i> (Ochnaceae). Expected journal: Systematics and Biodiversity.
Reinales S, Ferreira de Sousa HC, Pirani JR, Trovó M. & Cardoso D. in prep. Comparative seed structure and evolution of dispersal systems in the tribe Sauvagesieae (Ochnaceae). Expected journal: New Phytologist.
Scoring Rubric
Your name:
c1. Scientific Merit
-
Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points
-
Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points
-
Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points
-
Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points
This proposal scores:
/35
C2. Community Building
-
Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points
-
Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points
-
Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points
This proposal scores:
/25
C3. Broader Impacts
-
The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points
-
The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits – up to 10 points
-
The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange – up to 10 points
This proposal scores:
/40
Applicant Details
email:
Country:
Target organism/s:
Previous publications
Budget (USD):
2000
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) - São Paulo
Affiliation:
Grant Assessment
Last Name:
Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?
Year of previous application: