top of page

Research Grants

This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.

Systematics and biogeography of Inga Mill.

Project summary:

This project conducts a taxonomic revision of Inga species in Amazonas, Brazil, integrating herbarium studies and field collections. It aims to clarify species identities, distributions, and habitats, producing descriptions, illustrations, and identification keys to support biodiversity knowledge and conservation.

First Name:

CAROLINA

Highest degree:

Master’s degree

Year obtained:

2024

Applicant Status:

Current student

Brasil

Flowering plants

Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):

Wagner, C.; Lima, R. A. O retorno da pesquisa etnobotânica na comunidade praia de
Lábrea no município de Lábrea-AM: da informação ao conhecimento. Revista Ensino
de Ciências e Humanidades, v. 9, p. 188-206, 2025.

Wagner, C.; Fernandez, C. L. P.; Silva, D. M. P. et al. Conhecimento tradicional de
plantas medicinais utilizadas pelos moradores de comunidades ribeirinhas no sul do
Amazonas, Brasil. Rio Branco: Stricto Sensu, 2025. ISBN: 978-65-80261-60-4. DOI:
10.35170/ss.ed.9786580261604

Wagner, C., Barbosa, M. S., Chaves, R. C., & Lima, R. A. Percepção da comunidade
acadêmica do Instituto de Educação, Agricultura e Ambiente – IEAA sobre a dengue no
sul do Amazonas. Revista Sustinere, 13(1), 181 – 201, 2025.
https://doi.org/10.12957/sustinere.2025.77290

Wagner, C.; Silva, V. V.; Lima, R. A. A vivência do estágio na docência: um relato de
experiência durante a disciplina de ecologia na Pós-graduação. Humanidades &
inovação, v.9, p.325-334, 2022.

Scoring Rubric

Your name:

c1. Scientific Merit

 

  • Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points

  • Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points

  • Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points

  • Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/35

C2. Community Building

 

  • Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points

  • Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points

  • Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points

This proposal scores:

/25

C3. Broader Impacts

  • The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points

  • The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits  – up to 10 points

  • The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange  – up to 10 points

This proposal scores:

/40

Applicant Details

email:

Country:

Target organism/s:

Previous publications

Budget (USD):

2000

Federal University of Viçosa

Affiliation:

Grant Assessment

Last Name:

WAGNER

No

Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?

Year of previous application:

0

bottom of page