Research Grants
This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.
Unraveling the species diversity in the neotropical tree genus Aspidosperma (Apocynaceae) using morphometric and genomic data
Project summary:
Studies on species delimitation under integrative approaches have become common in recent years, contributing to more objective definitions of species. The neotropical genus Aspidosperma Mart. & Zucc. (Apocynaceae) is a model group for this type of investigation, because despite the recent advances in its systematics, species delimitation is often challenging.
First Name:
Andreza Stephanie de Souza Pereira
Highest degree:
PhD
Year obtained:
2020
Applicant Status:
Early-career researcher (PhD obtained within last three years)
Brazil
Flowering plants
Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):
BFG – The Brazil Flora Group; Pereira, A. S. de S. 2021. Brazilian Flora 2020: leveraging the power of a collaborative scientific network. Taxon, v.71, 178–198.
Alves-Silva, J.W.; Pereira, A.S. de S.; Coutinho, T.S.; Castello, A.C.D. 2021. Aspidosperma dardanoanum (Apocynaceae), a new species spanning from the Atlantic Forest into the Caatinga (Northeast Region, Brazil). Phytotaxa (on-line), v.491, 271–280.
Pereira, A.S. de S.; Castello, A.C.D.; Simões, A.O.; Koch, I. 2019. Reestablishment, new records, and a key for the species of Aspidosperma (Apocynaceae) from the Brazilian Amazon. Acta Botanica Brasilica, v.33, 1–20.
Pereira, A.S. de S.; Simões, A.O.; Santos, J.U.M. 2016. Taxonomy of Aspidosperma Mart. (Apocynaceae, Rauvolfioideae) in the State of Pará, Northern Brazil. Biota Neotropica (on-line), v.16, 1–23.
Scoring Rubric
Your name:
c1. Scientific Merit
-
Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points
-
Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points
-
Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points
-
Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points
This proposal scores:
/35
C2. Community Building
-
Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points
-
Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points
-
Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points
This proposal scores:
/25
C3. Broader Impacts
-
The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points
-
The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits – up to 10 points
-
The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange – up to 10 points
This proposal scores:
/40
Applicant Details
email:
Country:
Target organism/s:
Previous publications
Budget (USD):
1990
Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará (UFOPA)
Affiliation:
Grant Assessment
Last Name:
Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?
Year of previous application:

