Research Grants
This page is used to provide your assessment scores for each application. Please use the rubric below the application details to enter your name, your scores, and any notes on the application.
Phylogeny and taxonomic revision of Luehea and Lueheopsis (Malvaceae; Grewioideae)
Project summary:
Complete taxonomic study on the neotropical genera Luehea and Lueheopsis, to broaden the knowledge of this little-studied group, clarifying the evolutionary relationships between the two genera and individual taxa with molecular analysis. The objective will be to produce an updated monograph with descriptions, distributions, identification keys and conservation status.
First Name:
Samuele Gerace
Highest degree:
Master's degree
Year obtained:
2021
Applicant Status:
Current student
Brazil
Flowering plants
Relevant publications (minimum 1, maximum 4):
Gerace, S.; Peruzzi, L. (2022) Typification and checklist of the names in Trichospermum (Malvaceae, Grewioideae), Phytotaxa 558: 263-275. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.558.3.2
Gerace, S.; Bovini, M.G.; Peruzzi, L.; Baumgratz, J.F.A. (2022) Typification of names in the neotropical genus Luehea (Malvaceae: Grewioideae), Phytotaxa 542: 180-188. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.542.2.5
Gerace, S.; Bovini, M.G. (2021) Luehea. In: Flora e Funga do Brasil. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Available from: http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/floradobrasil/FB9091
Gerace, S.; Bovini, M.G. (2021) Lueheopsis. In: Flora e Funga do Brasil. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Available from: http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/floradobrasil/FB23564
Scoring Rubric
Your name:
c1. Scientific Merit
-
Scientific impact of the study in the proposed taxonomic group or the flora and funga of a geographic region – up to 10 points
-
Contribution to the generation of novel systematic/taxonomic/floristic data – up to 5 points
-
Quality and significance of questions being addressed – up to 10 points
-
Adequacy of methods for testing the research question (data collection/analysis/use of different tools) – up to 10 points
This proposal scores:
/35
C2. Community Building
-
Applicant’s potential for completing goals of the proposal within the time frame, and of professional success (based on CV, considering career stage) – up to 10 points
-
Explicit inclusion of (a) the use and generation of collections, and (b) conferring with taxonomic/nomenclatural experts – up to 10 points
-
Perceived need where more points are given for applicants from low- or middle-income countries – up to 5 points
This proposal scores:
/25
C3. Broader Impacts
-
The proposal will yield durable benefits and be disseminated through publications (e.g., taxonomic revisions, checklists, new data provided for existing databases, websites) – up to 20 points
-
The proposal involves taxonomic training, fieldwork, and herbarium visits – up to 10 points
-
The proposal involves outreach, mentoring, and mobility exchange – up to 10 points
This proposal scores:
/40
Applicant Details
email:
Country:
Target organism/s:
Previous publications
Budget (USD):
1980
University of Pisa
Affiliation:
Grant Assessment
Last Name:
Has the applicant applied for an IAPT Research Grant previously?
Year of previous application: