top of page

Small Collections Grant

This page is used to provide assessment scores for each  grant application assigned to you. Please use the rubric below the grant details to enter your assessment scores and any notes you wish to include.
Please note that all scores entered must be whole numbers (no decimals), or you will be unable to save this form.

Database, online publication, and processing backlog at Dourados Herbarium (DDMS), Central-West Brazil

Brazil

Database, Process backlog, Other

Cost (USD): 

2000

DDMS

Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados

Objective:

The Dourados Herbarium (DDMS) comprises a collection of ca. 6500 specimens from central-western Brazil, including regional collections of the Atlantic Forest and the highly threatened Pantanal wetland that had been recently massively devastated by fire. Thus, the main objective of preserving specimens and enhance the accessibility of the collection to the community became demanding. The grant will be invested in the following improvements:
1) Database all specimens using JABOT and provide online;
2) Increase the collection by processing all backlog with ca. 2500 specimens.

Timetable:

1) We estimate 1 month for training three interns; 6 months to digitize the collection using JABOT and provide the records online. We expect to digitize 240 specimens/week;
2) Conservation practises (e.g. removing exceeding paper, changing cover paper or sheet) will take place when manipulating specimens during digitizing. It will be performed simultaneously with digitizing process.
3) We estimate 2 months for mounting and incorporate the backlog in the collection.
Considering that any loss or damage to specimens is a tragic event because of the unique nature of the collections, we are convinced that the Herbarium DDMS and its associated collection will be greatly benefited if granted.

Scoring Rubric

Reviewer's name:

Collection Improvement (max. 120 points)

​​

  • Facilitating access to the physical collections by digitization (e.g., data entry, setting up database structure with an outline of the platform to be used, purchasing equipment, and imaging specimens) – up to 30 points.

  • Enhancing physical collections by improving the conservation status of specimens in the herbarium (e.g., better folders, protecting covers, mounting paper, labeling, etc.) – up to 30 points.

  • Curating specimens (e.g., updating families, species identification, identifying types) – up to 20 points.

  • Increasing our understanding of the flora or funga by making new herbarium specimens available, such as processing of backlog or collecting and mounting of new specimens from understudied sites – up to 20 points.

  • Securing collections by distribution of duplicates (or orphan collections) to other regional or international herbaria or shipping endangered collections to another herbarium – up to 20 points.

This proposal scores:

/120

Methods & Funding (max. 40 points)

​

  • Match between the proposed budget and methods for the aims described – up to 10 points.

  • Perceived need, the extent to which the project will benefit from IAPT funding: e.g., due to active floristic work or contribution to poorly collected sites, due to threatened conditions of collections, and for the degree of involvement of others (outreach and education). We give more points for herbaria in low- and middle-income countries – up to 20 points.

  • Sharing duplicate specimens with other herbaria – up to 10 points.

This proposal scores:

/40

Broader Impacts (max. 40 points)

​

  • Degree of regional importance of the collection or the taxonomic importance of the targeted collection – up to 10 points.

  • The project will yield durable benefits (specimens, digitized metadata, databases, websites) – up to 15 points.

  • The project involves outreach/mentoring and broad dissemination – up to 15 points.

This proposal scores:

/40

Proposal

Year of last successful SCG application:

Has applicant applied for SCG before?:

Plan:

The Herbarium DDMS holds vascular and avascular specimens, including fungi, from the Pantanal wetland, Atlantic Forest and Cerrado. The University provides the basic material for specimens processing and shipping. More recently, the curatorship of the Herbarium DDMS has changed with plans to improve the collection conditions. The main collection is stored in a 32 m² climatized room containing cabinets. However, backlog of ca. 2500 specimens is stored in cabinets allocated in the corridor because they are not processed, and we do not have available space to accommodate the backlog in the climatized collection room. The backlog is additionally accommodated in plastic bags to mitigate bug eating. Therefore, we are running against time to avoid specimens’ deterioration. We are working with two priorities: 1) digitize the current collection and make it available online; 2) process the backlog, digitize and incorporate in the collection. Currently, we are not able to perform the steps concomitantly. However, we expect to perform them simultaneously if the money is granted by increase the number of students working on it. The grant will be converted in three undergrad scholarships with 9 months duration each in order to:
1) Digitize the collection using the free access software for database management JABOT v.3 and publish it in an online platform (http://jabot.jbrj.gov.br/v3/consulta.php);
2) Improve exsiccates conservation;
3) Mounting and database backlog.

Institution:

IH Code:

Country:

Target areas:

Applicant First Name/s:

email:

Provide database online

"Other" target:

Augusto Giaretta de Oliveira

Applicant Last Name/s:

bottom of page