top of page

Small Collections Grant

This page is used to provide assessment scores for each  grant application assigned to you. Please use the rubric below the grant details to enter your assessment scores and any notes you wish to include.
Please note that all scores entered must be whole numbers (no decimals), or you will be unable to save this form.

Bryophytes and fungi of the Espírito Santo State, Brazil, scanning an unknown world

Brazil

Database

Cost (USD): 

2000

VIES

Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo

Objective:

The Herbarium VIES collection has about 46,500 specimens, of which approximately 2,000 correspond to bryophytes and fungi. The entire collection is digitalized, but for these groups it is essential to scan temporary histological laminas, spores or tissues to correct identifications. So, the microscopic photos for them are so important as the macroscopic photos available in virtual herbaria. Thus, the aim of this project is to scan the bryophytes and fungi laminas from the VIES Herbarium collection and make the virtual herbarium available, so that they can be consulted online by the experts.

Timetable:

To scan all fungi collection, according to the methods cited, the execution timetable provides for a period of 3 years, with an average of 500 samples per year, as it requires specific preparations for each group.
For a bryophyte collection, an estimated execution timetable for a 1-year for scanning the entire collection.
Thus, in the first year of the project execution, 100% of the bryophyte collection will be scanned and 1/3 of the fungi collection, in the second year 2/3 of the fungi collection, and in the third year, 100% of the fungi collection.

Scoring Rubric

Reviewer's name:

Collection Improvement (max. 120 points)

  • Facilitating access to the physical collections by digitization (e.g., data entry, setting up database structure with an outline of the platform to be used, purchasing equipment, and imaging specimens) – up to 30 points.

  • Enhancing physical collections by improving the conservation status of specimens in the herbarium (e.g., better folders, protecting covers, mounting paper, labeling, etc.) – up to 30 points.

  • Curating specimens (e.g., updating families, species identification, identifying types) – up to 20 points.

  • Increasing our understanding of the flora or funga by making new herbarium specimens available, such as processing of backlog or collecting and mounting of new specimens from understudied sites – up to 20 points.

  • Securing collections by distribution of duplicates (or orphan collections) to other regional or international herbaria or shipping endangered collections to another herbarium – up to 20 points.

This proposal scores:

/120

Methods & Funding (max. 40 points)

  • Match between the proposed budget and methods for the aims described – up to 10 points.

  • Perceived need, the extent to which the project will benefit from IAPT funding: e.g., due to active floristic work or contribution to poorly collected sites, due to threatened conditions of collections, and for the degree of involvement of others (outreach and education). We give more points for herbaria in low- and middle-income countries – up to 20 points.

  • Sharing duplicate specimens with other herbaria – up to 10 points.

This proposal scores:

/40

Broader Impacts (max. 40 points)

  • Degree of regional importance of the collection or the taxonomic importance of the targeted collection – up to 10 points.

  • The project will yield durable benefits (specimens, digitized metadata, databases, websites) – up to 15 points.

  • The project involves outreach/mentoring and broad dissemination – up to 15 points.

This proposal scores:

/40

Proposal

Year of last successful SCG application:

Has applicant applied for SCG before?:

Plan:

For fungi, histological sections of the dehydrated basidiomes will be made freehand using steel blades and then mounted in solution KOH 3%, Phloxin and Melzer reagent; or small portions of the gleba will be removed with a needle to scan the basidiospores. For exoperidium, small parts will be removed and sectioned and mounted on laminas and glass slides to scan the hyphae. For ascospores and conidia the anatomical preparations will be made in distilled water and solutions of lugol 2% and KOH 10%. For other structures specific bibliographies will be used.
For bryophytes, the scan will be performed in a 10x lens for the general gametophyte structure and for specific parts relevant to specimen identification. In mosses, the 10x, 40x and 100x lens will be used for gametophyte and for sporophyte. For liverworts, the general structure of the gametophyte will be scanned (10x), as well as the structures (100x). For the talose species, the scanned laminas will contain the thallus structure (10x) and its cross section (100x). For anthoceros, the thallus structure will be scanned (10x) and its cross-section and spore (100x).
The images will be uploaded to the INCT-HVFF (CRIA servers located at RNP Internet Datacenter, Brasília, Brazil) and Reflora (servers located at Internet Datacenter at the Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) virtual herbaria servers and available with free and open access at http://inct.splink.org.br/ and http://vies.jbrj.gov.br/.

Institution:

IH Code:

Country:

Target areas:

Applicant First Name/s:

email:

"Other" target:

Valquiria Ferreira Dutra

Applicant Last Name/s:

bottom of page