top of page

Small Collections Grant

This page is used to provide assessment scores for each  grant application assigned to you. Please use the rubric below the grant details to enter your assessment scores and any notes you wish to include.
Please note that all scores entered must be whole numbers (no decimals), or you will be unable to save this form.

Digitizing UIDEP herbarium collection: A pilot project for the documentation and dissemination of urban plant diversity in Greater Jakarta, Indonesia

Indonesia

Database, Digitally image

Cost (USD): 

2000

UIDEP

Department of Biology, Fac. Math and Natural Sciences, Universitas Indonesia

Objective:

We urge to establish a university scale modern herbarium with digitalized specimen collections, a good resolution of images, and accessible database information to public and scientific community through website. We plan to pursue it in 3 objectives:
1. To establish a digital database of herbarium specimens
2. To generate a standardized workflow in herbarium
3. To build an online database on web portal

Timetable:

We will breakdown the timetable into 4 stages:
1. Benchmarking: team visits and receives training on specimen digitization at Herbarium Bogoriense (BO). (1 week)
2. Setting up space and procedure: The team develops, simulates, and evaluates the efficient standard operating procedure and workflow; purchases equipment and sets up digitization station (including renovation and repair). Validation on each specimens will continuously takes place. (4 weeks)
3. Digitizing: Volunteers training for one week. Target will be set up for approximately 7,200 fern and seed plant sheets are digitized (60 sheets/day/person), with ca. 100 genera are stored in proper genus cover. Evaluation will be held in the end of each month. (6 months)
4. Databasing: The team consults and develops the online database with the website developer. The team focuses on data upload, dissemination, and public test. the online database is established and accessible to students and public. (4 months)

Scoring Rubric

Reviewer's name:

Collection Improvement (max. 120 points)

  • Facilitating access to the physical collections by digitization (e.g., data entry, setting up database structure with an outline of the platform to be used, purchasing equipment, and imaging specimens) – up to 30 points.

  • Enhancing physical collections by improving the conservation status of specimens in the herbarium (e.g., better folders, protecting covers, mounting paper, labeling, etc.) – up to 30 points.

  • Curating specimens (e.g., updating families, species identification, identifying types) – up to 20 points.

  • Increasing our understanding of the flora or funga by making new herbarium specimens available, such as processing of backlog or collecting and mounting of new specimens from understudied sites – up to 20 points.

  • Securing collections by distribution of duplicates (or orphan collections) to other regional or international herbaria or shipping endangered collections to another herbarium – up to 20 points.

This proposal scores:

/120

Methods & Funding (max. 40 points)

  • Match between the proposed budget and methods for the aims described – up to 10 points.

  • Perceived need, the extent to which the project will benefit from IAPT funding: e.g., due to active floristic work or contribution to poorly collected sites, due to threatened conditions of collections, and for the degree of involvement of others (outreach and education). We give more points for herbaria in low- and middle-income countries – up to 20 points.

  • Sharing duplicate specimens with other herbaria – up to 10 points.

This proposal scores:

/40

Broader Impacts (max. 40 points)

  • Degree of regional importance of the collection or the taxonomic importance of the targeted collection – up to 10 points.

  • The project will yield durable benefits (specimens, digitized metadata, databases, websites) – up to 15 points.

  • The project involves outreach/mentoring and broad dissemination – up to 15 points.

This proposal scores:

/40

Proposal

Year of last successful SCG application:

Has applicant applied for SCG before?:

Plan:

1. Attending training and workshops on specimen digitization
2. Setting up a proper workspace for digitization
3. Establishing a workflow and standard operating procedure (SOP) of specimen digitization
4. Pre-digitization curation, consist of Characterization and validation of the herbarium collection
5. Digitizing herbarium data: imaging, databasing, backing up all digital data
6. Preserving (decontaminating) and storing of the digitized specimens
7. Combining and disseminating through web portal

Institution:

IH Code:

Country:

Target areas:

Applicant First Name/s:

email:

improving collection management

"Other" target:

Mega Atria

Applicant Last Name/s:

bottom of page